Keeping Out of Court III

A. Bricker
{"title":"Keeping Out of Court III","authors":"A. Bricker","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192846150.003.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"By the mid-eighteenth century, the courts had largely devised effective procedures for handling verbal evasion and booksellers’ tricks. This final chapter brings together these legal developments to show how increased regulatory pressures accidentally promoted the ‘deverbalization’ of satire. Caricaturists, for example, used words sparingly, and their visual satires were therefore not subject to the same courtroom procedures that had enabled the prosecution of printed satire. In a similar way, the Stage Licensing Act (1737), which mandated the pre-performance regulation of play texts, also promoted deverbalization. Dramatic works from this period, and especially the plays of Samuel Foote, are teeming with non-verbal satire, especially pointed impersonations. However, dramatic regulation also created a loophole: physical and acoustic mimicry never showed up in the playscripts submitted for licensing, and plays could only later be subjected to post-performance censorship. The end result was deverbalized forms of visual and dramatic satire that were often, at least early on, almost impossible to regulate.","PeriodicalId":374965,"journal":{"name":"Libel and Lampoon","volume":"137 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Libel and Lampoon","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192846150.003.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

By the mid-eighteenth century, the courts had largely devised effective procedures for handling verbal evasion and booksellers’ tricks. This final chapter brings together these legal developments to show how increased regulatory pressures accidentally promoted the ‘deverbalization’ of satire. Caricaturists, for example, used words sparingly, and their visual satires were therefore not subject to the same courtroom procedures that had enabled the prosecution of printed satire. In a similar way, the Stage Licensing Act (1737), which mandated the pre-performance regulation of play texts, also promoted deverbalization. Dramatic works from this period, and especially the plays of Samuel Foote, are teeming with non-verbal satire, especially pointed impersonations. However, dramatic regulation also created a loophole: physical and acoustic mimicry never showed up in the playscripts submitted for licensing, and plays could only later be subjected to post-performance censorship. The end result was deverbalized forms of visual and dramatic satire that were often, at least early on, almost impossible to regulate.
远离法庭三
到18世纪中期,法院基本上设计了有效的程序来处理口头逃避和书商的诡计。最后一章汇集了这些法律发展,以显示监管压力的增加如何意外地促进了讽刺作品的“去语言化”。例如,讽刺漫画家使用的文字很少,因此他们的视觉讽刺作品不受起诉印刷讽刺作品的相同法庭程序的约束。以类似的方式,舞台许可法案(1737),它规定了演出前的戏剧文本的规定,也促进了去语言化。这一时期的戏剧作品,尤其是塞缪尔·富特的戏剧,充满了非语言的讽刺,尤其是尖锐的模仿。然而,戏剧规则也造成了一个漏洞:提交许可的剧本中从未出现过物理和声学模仿,并且戏剧只能在演出后进行审查。最终的结果是视觉和戏剧讽刺的非语言形式,至少在早期,几乎不可能监管。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信