Discussion in College Math.

R. M. Dahlke, Ronald P. Morash
{"title":"Discussion in College Math.","authors":"R. M. Dahlke, Ronald P. Morash","doi":"10.1080/00193089.1982.10533753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"tionale often given for the replacement of the conven tional mode is that it fails to permit as much active par ticipation by students as do some alternative modes, and thus that students are largely passive observers in the conventional classroom. We believe that this is often true, especially in mathematics courses, where lecture is often given undue emphasis and a discussion compo nent is too seldom integrated sufficiently into the fabric of a course. We consider this situation to be both undesirable and unnecessary. In the body of this paper, we will present a number of ideas for achieving a better balance of these two components. Even if one disagrees with studies that allege the superiority of certain alternative modes over lecture discussion, one must admit that some educational goals","PeriodicalId":126898,"journal":{"name":"Improving College and University Teaching","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1982-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Improving College and University Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00193089.1982.10533753","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

tionale often given for the replacement of the conven tional mode is that it fails to permit as much active par ticipation by students as do some alternative modes, and thus that students are largely passive observers in the conventional classroom. We believe that this is often true, especially in mathematics courses, where lecture is often given undue emphasis and a discussion compo nent is too seldom integrated sufficiently into the fabric of a course. We consider this situation to be both undesirable and unnecessary. In the body of this paper, we will present a number of ideas for achieving a better balance of these two components. Even if one disagrees with studies that allege the superiority of certain alternative modes over lecture discussion, one must admit that some educational goals
大学数学中的讨论。
替代传统教学模式的理由通常是,它不像其他教学模式那样允许学生积极参与,因此学生在传统课堂上基本上是被动的观察者。我们认为这通常是正确的,特别是在数学课程中,讲课经常被过分强调,讨论的组成部分很少充分地融入课程的结构中。我们认为这种情况既不可取也没有必要。在本文的主体部分,我们将提出一些实现这两个组件更好平衡的想法。即使一个人不同意那些声称某些替代模式优于课堂讨论的研究,他也必须承认一些教育目标
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信