Continuity Through Change: Developmentalism and Neoliberalism in Democratic Brazil (1985-2018)

Matthew M. Taylor
{"title":"Continuity Through Change: Developmentalism and Neoliberalism in Democratic Brazil (1985-2018)","authors":"Matthew M. Taylor","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3551443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Conventional wisdom claims that Brazilian economic governance underwent a sea-change over the three decades between the return to democracy and the election of 2018. Yet even during moments of intense reform, Brazil adopted a much more moderate and incremental approach than its Latin American peers, preserving the building blocks of the \"developmental state.\" This paper charts the period from the 1980s to the end of 2018, which subtly shifted patterns and priorities of economic policy, but in many ways preserved its overall tenor and format. Changes arose more as a result of external or fiscal constraints than because of a clear consensus in favor of dismantling the developmental state; without such pressures, there is little reason to believe that reforms would have happened at all. Most of the changes of 1985-2018 generation, as a consequence, were in the direction of strengthening the state — increasing the autonomy of the bureaucracy, gaining control of the fiscal accounts, and imposing monetary authority — rather than in the direction of dramatically overhauling the developmental emphasis of that state. In consequence, while the density of policies may have changed, the contours of the developmental state remain, despite a generation of reforms.","PeriodicalId":210638,"journal":{"name":"Center for Latin American & Latino Studies (CLALS) Working Paper Series","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Center for Latin American & Latino Studies (CLALS) Working Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3551443","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Conventional wisdom claims that Brazilian economic governance underwent a sea-change over the three decades between the return to democracy and the election of 2018. Yet even during moments of intense reform, Brazil adopted a much more moderate and incremental approach than its Latin American peers, preserving the building blocks of the "developmental state." This paper charts the period from the 1980s to the end of 2018, which subtly shifted patterns and priorities of economic policy, but in many ways preserved its overall tenor and format. Changes arose more as a result of external or fiscal constraints than because of a clear consensus in favor of dismantling the developmental state; without such pressures, there is little reason to believe that reforms would have happened at all. Most of the changes of 1985-2018 generation, as a consequence, were in the direction of strengthening the state — increasing the autonomy of the bureaucracy, gaining control of the fiscal accounts, and imposing monetary authority — rather than in the direction of dramatically overhauling the developmental emphasis of that state. In consequence, while the density of policies may have changed, the contours of the developmental state remain, despite a generation of reforms.
变化中的连续性:民主巴西的发展主义和新自由主义(1985-2018)
传统观点认为,从恢复民主到2018年大选的30年间,巴西的经济治理经历了翻天覆地的变化。然而,即使在激烈的改革时期,巴西也采取了比拉丁美洲其他国家更为温和和渐进的方式,保留了“发展中国家”的基本要素。本文绘制了从20世纪80年代到2018年底这段时间的图表,这段时间经济政策的模式和重点发生了微妙的变化,但在许多方面保持了其总体基调和形式。变化的出现更多是由于外部或财政限制,而不是因为赞成废除发展国家的明确共识;如果没有这样的压力,几乎没有理由相信改革会发生。因此,1985年至2018年这一代人的大部分变化都是朝着加强国家的方向发展的——增加官僚机构的自主权,获得对财政账户的控制,并施加货币权威——而不是朝着大幅改革国家发展重点的方向发展的。因此,尽管政策的密度可能发生了变化,但发展中国家的轮廓仍然存在,尽管进行了一代人的改革。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信