How Would New York Ventilator Reallocation Policies Perform During a COVID-19 Surge? An Observational Cohort Study

B. C. Walsh, D. Pradhan
{"title":"How Would New York Ventilator Reallocation Policies Perform During a COVID-19 Surge? An Observational Cohort Study","authors":"B. C. Walsh, D. Pradhan","doi":"10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2021.203.1_meetingabstracts.a2584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"COVID-19 has created significant strain on the supply of healthcare resources and, during the spring surge in New York City, many hospitals prepared resource allocation policies should the demand for ventilators exceed supply. In such circumstances, resources should remain allocated to patients most likely to survive. Understanding how these guidelines perform is an important consideration in disaster planning. Numerous allocation guidelines exist however nearly all utilize a Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score. We sought to evaluate the performance of ventilator reallocation by applying the New York State Ventilator Allocation Guidelines (NYVAG) to a large cohort of COVID-19 patients. Our retrospective cohort included 895 intubated COVID-19 patients admitted to an academic system in New York City. SOFA scores were calculated for every day of mechanical ventilation. Per NYVAG, patients would have their ventilator reallocated at 48 hours if their interval SOFA score increased, did not change from an initial SOFA of 8-11, or was greater than 11. At 120 hours it would be reallocated if their SOFA score worsened or was greater than 7. At 168 hours and every subsequent 48 hours it would be reallocated if their SOFA score worsened. Ventilator reallocation was simulated and no reallocation was made for any patient. The average SOFA (n=895) at the time of intubation was 7.1 ± 3.6. At the 48-hour reassessment (average SOFA 8.2 ± 3.6, n=759), 436 (57%) patients would have their ventilator reallocated, 145 (33%) of whom would later survive to discharge. At the 120-hour reassessment (average SOFA 7.8 ± 3.6, n=264) 173 (66%) of the 264 remaining simulated ventilated patients would have their ventilators reallocated, 83 (48%) of whom would later survive to discharge. At the 168-hour reassessment (average SOFA 7.8 ± 3.6, n=80) 66 (83%) of the 80 simulated remaining ventilated patients would have their ventilators reallocated. Overall, 685 patients (77%) of the starting cohort would have had their ventilator reallocated at some time during the first 168 hours of mechanical ventilation, 268 (40%) of whom survived to discharge. Our simulated study found that the application of NYVAG to the COVID-19 surge at one academic system would have resulted in a significant portion of ventilated patients having had their ventilators reallocated. This may be deeply concerning as a significant portion of patients ultimately survived to discharge. These results call for further confirmatory studies and have implications for optimal resource allocation strategies during pandemics.","PeriodicalId":388725,"journal":{"name":"TP50. TP050 COVID: NONPULMONARY CRITICAL CARE, MECHANICAL VENTILATION, BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, AND EPI","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TP50. TP050 COVID: NONPULMONARY CRITICAL CARE, MECHANICAL VENTILATION, BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, AND EPI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2021.203.1_meetingabstracts.a2584","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

COVID-19 has created significant strain on the supply of healthcare resources and, during the spring surge in New York City, many hospitals prepared resource allocation policies should the demand for ventilators exceed supply. In such circumstances, resources should remain allocated to patients most likely to survive. Understanding how these guidelines perform is an important consideration in disaster planning. Numerous allocation guidelines exist however nearly all utilize a Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score. We sought to evaluate the performance of ventilator reallocation by applying the New York State Ventilator Allocation Guidelines (NYVAG) to a large cohort of COVID-19 patients. Our retrospective cohort included 895 intubated COVID-19 patients admitted to an academic system in New York City. SOFA scores were calculated for every day of mechanical ventilation. Per NYVAG, patients would have their ventilator reallocated at 48 hours if their interval SOFA score increased, did not change from an initial SOFA of 8-11, or was greater than 11. At 120 hours it would be reallocated if their SOFA score worsened or was greater than 7. At 168 hours and every subsequent 48 hours it would be reallocated if their SOFA score worsened. Ventilator reallocation was simulated and no reallocation was made for any patient. The average SOFA (n=895) at the time of intubation was 7.1 ± 3.6. At the 48-hour reassessment (average SOFA 8.2 ± 3.6, n=759), 436 (57%) patients would have their ventilator reallocated, 145 (33%) of whom would later survive to discharge. At the 120-hour reassessment (average SOFA 7.8 ± 3.6, n=264) 173 (66%) of the 264 remaining simulated ventilated patients would have their ventilators reallocated, 83 (48%) of whom would later survive to discharge. At the 168-hour reassessment (average SOFA 7.8 ± 3.6, n=80) 66 (83%) of the 80 simulated remaining ventilated patients would have their ventilators reallocated. Overall, 685 patients (77%) of the starting cohort would have had their ventilator reallocated at some time during the first 168 hours of mechanical ventilation, 268 (40%) of whom survived to discharge. Our simulated study found that the application of NYVAG to the COVID-19 surge at one academic system would have resulted in a significant portion of ventilated patients having had their ventilators reallocated. This may be deeply concerning as a significant portion of patients ultimately survived to discharge. These results call for further confirmatory studies and have implications for optimal resource allocation strategies during pandemics.
在COVID-19激增期间,纽约的呼吸机重新分配政策将如何执行?一项观察性队列研究
COVID-19对医疗资源供应造成了巨大压力,在纽约市春季疫情高峰期间,许多医院制定了资源分配政策,以防呼吸机供不应求。在这种情况下,资源应继续分配给最有可能存活的患者。了解这些指导方针如何执行是灾难规划中的一个重要考虑因素。目前存在许多分配指南,但几乎所有指南都采用序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分。我们试图通过将纽约州呼吸机分配指南(NYVAG)应用于大型COVID-19患者队列来评估呼吸机重新分配的性能。我们的回顾性队列包括纽约市一个学术系统收治的895名插管的COVID-19患者。计算每天机械通气的SOFA评分。根据NYVAG,如果患者的间歇SOFA评分增加,未从初始SOFA 8-11改变,或大于11,则患者将在48小时内重新分配呼吸机。在120小时时,如果他们的SOFA评分恶化或大于7分,将重新分配。在168小时和随后的每48小时,如果他们的SOFA评分恶化,将重新分配。模拟呼吸机重新分配,未对任何患者进行重新分配。插管时平均SOFA (n=895)为7.1±3.6。在48小时重新评估时(平均SOFA 8.2±3.6,n=759), 436例(57%)患者将重新分配呼吸机,其中145例(33%)患者后来存活至出院。在120小时重新评估时(平均SOFA 7.8±3.6,n=264),剩余264例模拟通气患者中有173例(66%)重新分配了呼吸机,其中83例(48%)存活至出院。在168小时重新评估时(平均SOFA 7.8±3.6,n=80), 80例模拟剩余通气患者中有66例(83%)需要重新配置呼吸机。总体而言,起始队列中有685名患者(77%)在机械通气的前168小时内的某个时间重新分配了呼吸机,其中268名(40%)存活至出院。我们的模拟研究发现,在一个学术系统中,将NYVAG应用于COVID-19激增将导致很大一部分呼吸机患者重新分配呼吸机。这可能是非常令人担忧的,因为很大一部分患者最终存活到出院。这些结果需要进一步的验证性研究,并对大流行期间的最佳资源分配策略具有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信