7. CONCLUSION

A. Kalavade, E. Lee, K. Keutzer, S. Malik, A. R. Newton, J. Rabaey, A. Sangiovanni-Vincentelli
{"title":"7. CONCLUSION","authors":"A. Kalavade, E. Lee, K. Keutzer, S. Malik, A. R. Newton, J. Rabaey, A. Sangiovanni-Vincentelli","doi":"10.1515/9789048536825-009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The notion that genuine and substantive Australian engagement with Asia began only with Whitlam’s 1972 recognition of communist China and came to full expression with the Hawke and Keating governments from 1983 into the 1990s is not borne out by the postwar historical record. Indeed, close attention to that record supports the proposition that decolonisation in Southeast Asia, and Cold War strategic imperatives across the region more broadly, drew Australia into deep and genuine political relationships with many Asian states, based on shared normative as well as security concerns.","PeriodicalId":319219,"journal":{"name":"Foreign Powers and Intervention in Armed Conflicts","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foreign Powers and Intervention in Armed Conflicts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9789048536825-009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The notion that genuine and substantive Australian engagement with Asia began only with Whitlam’s 1972 recognition of communist China and came to full expression with the Hawke and Keating governments from 1983 into the 1990s is not borne out by the postwar historical record. Indeed, close attention to that record supports the proposition that decolonisation in Southeast Asia, and Cold War strategic imperatives across the region more broadly, drew Australia into deep and genuine political relationships with many Asian states, based on shared normative as well as security concerns.
7. 结论
有一种观点认为,澳大利亚与亚洲的真正和实质性接触始于惠特拉姆1972年承认共产主义中国,并在1983年至20世纪90年代的霍克(Hawke)和基廷(Keating)政府期间得到充分体现,这种观点并没有得到战后历史记录的证实。事实上,对这一记录的密切关注支持了这样一种观点,即东南亚的非殖民化以及整个地区更广泛的冷战战略需要,使澳大利亚与许多亚洲国家建立了基于共同规范和安全关切的深刻而真正的政治关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信