Potential synergies of theorem proving and model checking for software product lines

Thomas Thüm, Jens Meinicke, Fabian Benduhn, Martin Hentschel, Alexander von Rhein, G. Saake
{"title":"Potential synergies of theorem proving and model checking for software product lines","authors":"Thomas Thüm, Jens Meinicke, Fabian Benduhn, Martin Hentschel, Alexander von Rhein, G. Saake","doi":"10.1145/2648511.2648530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The verification of software product lines is an active research area. A challenge is to efficiently verify similar products without the need to generate and verify them individually. As solution, researchers suggest family-based verification approaches, which either transform compile-time into runtime variability or make verification tools variability-aware. Existing approaches either focus on theorem proving, model checking, or other verification techniques. For the first time, we combine theorem proving and model checking to evaluate their synergies for product-line verification. We provide tool support by connecting five existing tools, namely FeatureIDE and FeatureHouse for product-line development, as well as KeY, JPF, and OpenJML for verification of Java programs. In an experiment, we found the synergy of improved effectiveness and efficiency, especially for product lines with few defects. Further, we experienced that model checking and theorem proving are more efficient and effective if the product line contains more defects.","PeriodicalId":303765,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 18th International Software Product Line Conference - Volume 1","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"38","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 18th International Software Product Line Conference - Volume 1","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2648511.2648530","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 38

Abstract

The verification of software product lines is an active research area. A challenge is to efficiently verify similar products without the need to generate and verify them individually. As solution, researchers suggest family-based verification approaches, which either transform compile-time into runtime variability or make verification tools variability-aware. Existing approaches either focus on theorem proving, model checking, or other verification techniques. For the first time, we combine theorem proving and model checking to evaluate their synergies for product-line verification. We provide tool support by connecting five existing tools, namely FeatureIDE and FeatureHouse for product-line development, as well as KeY, JPF, and OpenJML for verification of Java programs. In an experiment, we found the synergy of improved effectiveness and efficiency, especially for product lines with few defects. Further, we experienced that model checking and theorem proving are more efficient and effective if the product line contains more defects.
软件产品线的定理证明和模型检验的潜在协同作用
软件产品线的验证是一个活跃的研究领域。一个挑战是在不需要单独生成和验证的情况下有效地验证类似的产品。作为解决方案,研究人员提出了基于家族的验证方法,该方法要么将编译时的可变性转换为运行时的可变性,要么使验证工具具有可变性意识。现有的方法要么关注定理证明、模型检查,要么关注其他验证技术。我们首次将定理证明和模型检验结合起来,评价它们对生产线验证的协同作用。我们通过连接五个现有的工具来提供工具支持,即用于产品线开发的FeatureIDE和FeatureHouse,以及用于验证Java程序的KeY、JPF和OpenJML。在一个实验中,我们发现了改进的有效性和效率的协同作用,特别是对于缺陷较少的产品线。进一步,我们经验到,如果产品线包含更多的缺陷,则模型检查和定理证明的效率更高,效果更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信