Machine Learning Algorithms in Financial Market Risk Prediction

Zongshun Hu
{"title":"Machine Learning Algorithms in Financial Market Risk Prediction","authors":"Zongshun Hu","doi":"10.1145/3572647.3572692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the current complex international environment, whether it is data volume, data quality or computing power, the era of big data is different from the past. In addition to data problems, there are also algorithm problems that restrict the development of financial risk control, and the rapid development of machine learning just makes up for this deficiency. The purpose of this paper is to comprehensively compare the default risk early warning effects of machine learning algorithms and traditional statistical Logistic models, and to further select the most appropriate financial risk early warning model in the machine learning algorithm, so as to provide a scientific basis for online lending platforms to select default rate early warning models. method. This paper mainly studies the comparison of the prediction effects of the four models. In the test set, the early warning accuracy rate of the Logistic model is only 62.74%, while the early warning accuracy rate of the machine learning model is generally between 83% and 93%, and the accuracy rate of the integrated algorithm is generally around 90%. The lowest accuracy rate of the Stacking algorithm It also reached 85.8%, while the accuracy of the base classification algorithm was lower than 83%. The results show that, based on the specific scenario of loan risk assessment, the early warning accuracy of the machine learning algorithm is generally higher than that of the Logistic model, and it is more suitable for financial market risk prediction.","PeriodicalId":118352,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2022 6th International Conference on E-Business and Internet","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2022 6th International Conference on E-Business and Internet","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3572647.3572692","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the current complex international environment, whether it is data volume, data quality or computing power, the era of big data is different from the past. In addition to data problems, there are also algorithm problems that restrict the development of financial risk control, and the rapid development of machine learning just makes up for this deficiency. The purpose of this paper is to comprehensively compare the default risk early warning effects of machine learning algorithms and traditional statistical Logistic models, and to further select the most appropriate financial risk early warning model in the machine learning algorithm, so as to provide a scientific basis for online lending platforms to select default rate early warning models. method. This paper mainly studies the comparison of the prediction effects of the four models. In the test set, the early warning accuracy rate of the Logistic model is only 62.74%, while the early warning accuracy rate of the machine learning model is generally between 83% and 93%, and the accuracy rate of the integrated algorithm is generally around 90%. The lowest accuracy rate of the Stacking algorithm It also reached 85.8%, while the accuracy of the base classification algorithm was lower than 83%. The results show that, based on the specific scenario of loan risk assessment, the early warning accuracy of the machine learning algorithm is generally higher than that of the Logistic model, and it is more suitable for financial market risk prediction.
金融市场风险预测中的机器学习算法
在当前复杂的国际环境下,无论是数据量、数据质量还是计算能力,大数据时代都不同于以往。除了数据问题,还有算法问题制约着金融风控的发展,而机器学习的快速发展正好弥补了这一不足。本文的目的是全面比较机器学习算法和传统统计Logistic模型的违约风险预警效果,进一步在机器学习算法中选择最合适的金融风险预警模型,为网络借贷平台选择违约率预警模型提供科学依据。方法。本文主要对四种模型的预测效果进行比较研究。在测试集中,Logistic模型的预警准确率仅为62.74%,而机器学习模型的预警准确率一般在83% ~ 93%之间,综合算法的准确率一般在90%左右。堆叠算法的准确率最低,也达到了85.8%,而基础分类算法的准确率低于83%。结果表明,基于贷款风险评估的具体场景,机器学习算法的预警准确率普遍高于Logistic模型,更适合于金融市场风险预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信