Protecting Contactless Credit Card Payments from Fraud through Ambient Authentication and Machine Learning

Divneet Singh
{"title":"Protecting Contactless Credit Card Payments from Fraud through Ambient Authentication and Machine Learning","authors":"Divneet Singh","doi":"10.1109/ACCESS57397.2023.10200022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Credit card fraud (CCF) is a persistent issue in the financial sector with serious consequences. Data mining has proven to be extremely useful in detecting fraud in online transactions. However, detecting CCF through data mining is quite a difficult task because of two causes: constant changes in the profiles of normal and fraudulent behaviour, and the highly skewed nature of the data sets. The outcome of fraud detection in credit card transactions depends on the sampling approach, detection techniques, and variable selection. This work studies the performance of K-Nearest Neighbor, Naive Bayes, Logistic Regression and Random Forest algorithms on a highly skewed dataset. The dataset contains 2,84,807 transactions and has been collected from European cardholder transactions. A hybrid of under-sampling and oversampling techniques has been used on the skewed data. The four techniques were utilized on both data namely preprocessed and raw, and the results are evaluated using specificity, accuracy, sensitivity, and F1-score. The outcomes show that the optimal accuracy for Naive Bayes, Logistic Regression, K-Nearest Neighbor and Random Forest classifiers are 98.72%, 52.34%, 96.89%, 91.67%, respectively. The comparative results indicate that K-Nearest Neighbor performs better than Logistic Regression, Random Forest and Naive Bayes techniques.","PeriodicalId":345351,"journal":{"name":"2023 3rd International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication, Embedded and Secure Systems (ACCESS)","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 3rd International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication, Embedded and Secure Systems (ACCESS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS57397.2023.10200022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Credit card fraud (CCF) is a persistent issue in the financial sector with serious consequences. Data mining has proven to be extremely useful in detecting fraud in online transactions. However, detecting CCF through data mining is quite a difficult task because of two causes: constant changes in the profiles of normal and fraudulent behaviour, and the highly skewed nature of the data sets. The outcome of fraud detection in credit card transactions depends on the sampling approach, detection techniques, and variable selection. This work studies the performance of K-Nearest Neighbor, Naive Bayes, Logistic Regression and Random Forest algorithms on a highly skewed dataset. The dataset contains 2,84,807 transactions and has been collected from European cardholder transactions. A hybrid of under-sampling and oversampling techniques has been used on the skewed data. The four techniques were utilized on both data namely preprocessed and raw, and the results are evaluated using specificity, accuracy, sensitivity, and F1-score. The outcomes show that the optimal accuracy for Naive Bayes, Logistic Regression, K-Nearest Neighbor and Random Forest classifiers are 98.72%, 52.34%, 96.89%, 91.67%, respectively. The comparative results indicate that K-Nearest Neighbor performs better than Logistic Regression, Random Forest and Naive Bayes techniques.
通过环境认证和机器学习保护非接触式信用卡支付免受欺诈
信用卡诈骗(CCF)是金融领域的一个长期存在的问题,后果严重。数据挖掘已被证明在检测在线交易中的欺诈方面非常有用。然而,通过数据挖掘检测CCF是一项相当困难的任务,因为两个原因:正常和欺诈行为的概况不断变化,以及数据集的高度倾斜性质。信用卡交易欺诈检测的结果取决于采样方法、检测技术和变量选择。这项工作研究了k -最近邻,朴素贝叶斯,逻辑回归和随机森林算法在高度倾斜数据集上的性能。该数据集包含2,84,807笔交易,收集自欧洲持卡人交易。欠采样和过采样的混合技术已用于偏斜数据。这四种技术分别用于预处理和原始数据,并使用特异性、准确性、敏感性和f1评分对结果进行评估。结果表明,朴素贝叶斯分类器、逻辑回归分类器、k近邻分类器和随机森林分类器的最优准确率分别为98.72%、52.34%、96.89%、91.67%。对比结果表明,k近邻算法的性能优于逻辑回归、随机森林和朴素贝叶斯算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信