Outcome after surgical and conservative treatments of canine peritoneopericardial diaphragmatic hernia: A multi-institutional study of 128 dogs.

K. Morgan, Ameet Singh, M. Giuffrida, Ingrid M Balsa, G. Hayes, Margaret L Chu, Christopher B Thomson, Shiori Arai, D. Smeak, E. Monnet, L. Selmic, M. Cray, Janet A Grimes, Taylor M. Morris, J. Case, J. Biskup, Jason M. Haas, K. Thieman-Mankin, M. Milovancev, M. Gatineau
{"title":"Outcome after surgical and conservative treatments of canine peritoneopericardial diaphragmatic hernia: A multi-institutional study of 128 dogs.","authors":"K. Morgan, Ameet Singh, M. Giuffrida, Ingrid M Balsa, G. Hayes, Margaret L Chu, Christopher B Thomson, Shiori Arai, D. Smeak, E. Monnet, L. Selmic, M. Cray, Janet A Grimes, Taylor M. Morris, J. Case, J. Biskup, Jason M. Haas, K. Thieman-Mankin, M. Milovancev, M. Gatineau","doi":"10.1111/vsu.13360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nTo compare demographics and disease characteristics in dogs in which peritoneopericardial diaphragmatic hernia (PPDH) had been diagnosed and report outcomes after surgical treatment (ST) or conservative treatment (CT).\n\n\nSTUDY DESIGN\nRetrospective study.\n\n\nSAMPLE POPULATION\nOne hundred twenty-eight dogs (91 ST, 37 CT) in which PPDH had been diagnosed.\n\n\nMETHODS\nMedical records were reviewed for demographics, perioperative findings, and outcomes. Follow-up was obtained via telephone interview and email correspondence with owners and referring veterinarians. Baseline variables were compared between treatment groups.\n\n\nRESULTS\nDogs treated surgically were younger (P < .001), more likely to be sexually intact (P = .002), more likely to have clinical signs from PPDH vs an incidental diagnosis (P < .001), and more likely to have other congenital abnormalities (P = .003) compared with dogs treated conservatively. Ninety-seven percent of ST dogs were discharged from hospitals. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were reported in 22% and 41% of dogs, respectively, although most complications were classified as low grade (75% and 83%, respectively). Follow-up was available in 87 dogs, at a median of 1062 days. Hernia recurrence was not reported in any surgically treated dog. The deaths of nine dogs (five ST, four CT) could be attributed to PPDH, and long median survival times were observed in both the ST and CT groups (8.2 and 5 years, respectively).\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nPreoperative characteristics differed between dogs treated conservatively vs surgically. Surgical treatment was associated with low operative mortality, and both ST and CT dogs had good long-term survival.\n\n\nCLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE\nA diagnosis of PPDH can confer a good long-term prognosis for both ST and CT dogs.","PeriodicalId":123280,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary surgery : VS","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary surgery : VS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.13360","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To compare demographics and disease characteristics in dogs in which peritoneopericardial diaphragmatic hernia (PPDH) had been diagnosed and report outcomes after surgical treatment (ST) or conservative treatment (CT). STUDY DESIGN Retrospective study. SAMPLE POPULATION One hundred twenty-eight dogs (91 ST, 37 CT) in which PPDH had been diagnosed. METHODS Medical records were reviewed for demographics, perioperative findings, and outcomes. Follow-up was obtained via telephone interview and email correspondence with owners and referring veterinarians. Baseline variables were compared between treatment groups. RESULTS Dogs treated surgically were younger (P < .001), more likely to be sexually intact (P = .002), more likely to have clinical signs from PPDH vs an incidental diagnosis (P < .001), and more likely to have other congenital abnormalities (P = .003) compared with dogs treated conservatively. Ninety-seven percent of ST dogs were discharged from hospitals. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were reported in 22% and 41% of dogs, respectively, although most complications were classified as low grade (75% and 83%, respectively). Follow-up was available in 87 dogs, at a median of 1062 days. Hernia recurrence was not reported in any surgically treated dog. The deaths of nine dogs (five ST, four CT) could be attributed to PPDH, and long median survival times were observed in both the ST and CT groups (8.2 and 5 years, respectively). CONCLUSION Preoperative characteristics differed between dogs treated conservatively vs surgically. Surgical treatment was associated with low operative mortality, and both ST and CT dogs had good long-term survival. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE A diagnosis of PPDH can confer a good long-term prognosis for both ST and CT dogs.
犬腹膜心包膈疝手术和保守治疗的结果:一项128只犬的多机构研究。
目的比较诊断为腹膜心包膈疝(PPDH)的犬的人口统计学特征和疾病特征,并报告手术治疗(ST)或保守治疗(CT)的结果。研究设计回顾性研究。128只犬(91 ST, 37 CT)被诊断为PPDH。方法回顾医疗记录的人口统计学、围手术期发现和结果。通过电话采访和与饲主及转介兽医的电子邮件通信进行随访。比较治疗组之间的基线变量。结果与保守治疗的狗相比,手术治疗的狗更年轻(P < 0.001),更容易性完整(P = 0.002),更容易出现PPDH的临床症状(P < 0.001),更容易出现其他先天性异常(P = 0.003)。97%的ST犬出院。术中和术后并发症分别报告了22%和41%的狗,尽管大多数并发症被分类为低级别(分别为75%和83%)。对87只狗进行了随访,平均随访时间为1062天。没有任何手术治疗犬的疝气复发报告。9只狗(5只ST, 4只CT)的死亡可归因于PPDH, ST组和CT组的中位生存时间均较长(分别为8.2年和5年)。结论保守治疗与手术治疗犬术前特征不同。手术治疗与低手术死亡率相关,ST和CT犬均有良好的长期生存率。临床意义诊断PPDH可以为ST和CT犬提供良好的长期预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信