Crowdsourcing and Individual Creativity Over Time: The Detrimental Effects of Past Success

B. Bayus
{"title":"Crowdsourcing and Individual Creativity Over Time: The Detrimental Effects of Past Success","authors":"B. Bayus","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1667101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several organizations have developed online crowdsourcing platforms that tap into the “wisdom” (creative ideas for new products and services) of a large “crowd” of non-experts (consumers). The crowdsourcing model seems very attractive because consumers are intrinsically motivated to freely contribute their creative ideas, but little is known about the effectiveness of these approaches. Two years of panel data from Dell’s IdeaStorm system are used to empirically explore the relationship between individual creativity, productivity, and past success. Estimation results from random effects and conditional fixed effects logit models reveal that individual creativity is positively related to current effort, but negatively related to past success. Thus, productive individuals are likely to have creative ideas, but are unlikely to repeat their early creative success once their ideas are recognized as being creative. These findings highlight some of the difficulties in maintaining an adequate supply of creative ideas from existing crowdsourcing applications, and emphasize the need for a greater understanding of the reward and feedback mechanisms in these systems.","PeriodicalId":344620,"journal":{"name":"Entrepreneurship & Marketing eJournal","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"45","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Entrepreneurship & Marketing eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1667101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 45

Abstract

Several organizations have developed online crowdsourcing platforms that tap into the “wisdom” (creative ideas for new products and services) of a large “crowd” of non-experts (consumers). The crowdsourcing model seems very attractive because consumers are intrinsically motivated to freely contribute their creative ideas, but little is known about the effectiveness of these approaches. Two years of panel data from Dell’s IdeaStorm system are used to empirically explore the relationship between individual creativity, productivity, and past success. Estimation results from random effects and conditional fixed effects logit models reveal that individual creativity is positively related to current effort, but negatively related to past success. Thus, productive individuals are likely to have creative ideas, but are unlikely to repeat their early creative success once their ideas are recognized as being creative. These findings highlight some of the difficulties in maintaining an adequate supply of creative ideas from existing crowdsourcing applications, and emphasize the need for a greater understanding of the reward and feedback mechanisms in these systems.
随着时间的推移,众包和个人创造力:过去成功的有害影响
一些组织已经开发了在线众包平台,利用一大群非专家(消费者)的“智慧”(新产品和服务的创意)。众包模式似乎很有吸引力,因为消费者有内在的动机自由地贡献他们的创意,但人们对这些方法的有效性知之甚少。戴尔IdeaStorm系统两年的面板数据用于实证探索个人创造力、生产力和过去成功之间的关系。随机效应和条件固定效应logit模型的估计结果表明,个体创造力与当前的努力正相关,与过去的成功负相关。因此,富有成效的人可能有创造性的想法,但一旦他们的想法被认为是创造性的,就不太可能重复他们早期的创造性成功。这些发现突出了在现有众包应用中维持足够的创意供应的一些困难,并强调需要更好地理解这些系统中的奖励和反馈机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信