Hubungan agama dengan Pancasila dalam perspektif konstitusi

Yusuf Eko Nahuddin, Angga Prastyo
{"title":"Hubungan agama dengan Pancasila dalam perspektif konstitusi","authors":"Yusuf Eko Nahuddin, Angga Prastyo","doi":"10.26905/IDJCH.V11I3.4070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study is a normative legal research and uses a statute approach and applies a descriptive analysis method which is conducted to analyze the relationship between Religion and Pancasila in the perspective of the 1945 Constitution., and their position in the 1945 Constitution. Religion becomes an object of study that is so complex in its relation to the state. The last time it was seen as the statement of YudianWahyudi (Chairperson of BPIP) about religion as an enemy of Pancasila. The 1945 Constitution which is positioned highest in the hierarchy of statutory regulations is an appropriate indicator in examining the relationship between religion and Pancasila, especially in the framework of a normative legal paradigm in Indonesia. In the main analysis of the results and discussion of this study, it was concluded that Religion is a supporter of the existence of Pancasila, and Religion cannot be contested or compared with Pancasila in the context of its position and position in the state and the administration of government. These results are so important for efforts to realize the objectives of the state, in order to underpin the administration of state in an effective and efficient state, without revisiting the problems and debates that have actually been resolved. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v11i3.4070 . How to cite item: Nahuddin, Y., & Prastyo, A.(2020). Hubungan agama dengan Pancasila dalam perspektif konstitusi. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum , 11(3). 282-290.doi:10.26905/idjch.v11i3.4070.","PeriodicalId":207438,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum","volume":"1996 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26905/IDJCH.V11I3.4070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study is a normative legal research and uses a statute approach and applies a descriptive analysis method which is conducted to analyze the relationship between Religion and Pancasila in the perspective of the 1945 Constitution., and their position in the 1945 Constitution. Religion becomes an object of study that is so complex in its relation to the state. The last time it was seen as the statement of YudianWahyudi (Chairperson of BPIP) about religion as an enemy of Pancasila. The 1945 Constitution which is positioned highest in the hierarchy of statutory regulations is an appropriate indicator in examining the relationship between religion and Pancasila, especially in the framework of a normative legal paradigm in Indonesia. In the main analysis of the results and discussion of this study, it was concluded that Religion is a supporter of the existence of Pancasila, and Religion cannot be contested or compared with Pancasila in the context of its position and position in the state and the administration of government. These results are so important for efforts to realize the objectives of the state, in order to underpin the administration of state in an effective and efficient state, without revisiting the problems and debates that have actually been resolved. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v11i3.4070 . How to cite item: Nahuddin, Y., & Prastyo, A.(2020). Hubungan agama dengan Pancasila dalam perspektif konstitusi. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum , 11(3). 282-290.doi:10.26905/idjch.v11i3.4070.
从宪法角度来看,宗教与潘卡西拉的关系
本研究是一项规范性的法律研究,采用成文法的方法,运用描述性的分析方法,在1945年宪法的视角下分析宗教与潘卡西拉的关系。以及他们在1945年宪法中的地位。宗教成为研究的对象,因为它与国家的关系非常复杂。最后一次被认为是YudianWahyudi (BPIP主席)关于宗教是潘卡西拉的敌人的声明。1945年的《宪法》在法定法规等级中处于最高地位,是审查宗教与潘卡西拉之间关系的适当指标,特别是在印度尼西亚规范性法律范式的框架内。在对本研究结果的主要分析和讨论中,得出的结论是宗教是潘卡西拉存在的支持者,在其在国家和政府管理中的地位和地位的背景下,宗教不能被质疑或与潘卡西拉进行比较。这些结果对于实现国家目标的努力非常重要,以便在一个有效和高效的国家中巩固国家管理,而不必重新审视已经解决的问题和辩论。DOI: https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v11i3.4070。如何引用条目:Nahuddin, Y., & Prastyo, A.(2020)。我是说,我是说,我是说,我是说,我是说。中华医学杂志,11(3)。282 - 290. - doi: 10.26905 / idjch.v11i3.4070。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信