Performance Evaluation of Contiguous and Noncontiguous Processor Allocation Based on Common Communication Patterns for 2D Mesh Interconnection Network

Areen Al Abass, S. Bani-Mohammad, I. Ababneh
{"title":"Performance Evaluation of Contiguous and Noncontiguous Processor Allocation Based on Common Communication Patterns for 2D Mesh Interconnection Network","authors":"Areen Al Abass, S. Bani-Mohammad, I. Ababneh","doi":"10.4018/ijcac.295239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several processor allocation studies show that the performance of noncontiguous allocation is dramatically better than that of contiguous allocation, but this is not always true. The communication pattern may have a great effect on the performance of processor allocation algorithms. In this paper, the performance of well-known allocation algorithms is re-considered based on several communication patterns, including Near Neighbor, Ring, All-to-All, Divide and Conquer Binomial Tree (DQBT), Fast Fourier Transform (FFT), One-to-All, All-to-One, and Random. The allocation algorithms investigated include the contiguous First Fit (FF) and Best Fit (BF) and the noncontiguous Paging(0), Greedy Available Busy List (GABL) and Multiple Buddy Strategy (MBS). In near neighbor, FFT and DQBT, the simulation results show that the performance of contiguous allocation is dramatically better than that of the noncontiguous allocation in terms of response time; except for MBS in DQBT. In All-to-All, the results show that the performance of contiguous FF and BF is better than that of the noncontiguous MBS.","PeriodicalId":442336,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Cloud Appl. Comput.","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Cloud Appl. Comput.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/ijcac.295239","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Several processor allocation studies show that the performance of noncontiguous allocation is dramatically better than that of contiguous allocation, but this is not always true. The communication pattern may have a great effect on the performance of processor allocation algorithms. In this paper, the performance of well-known allocation algorithms is re-considered based on several communication patterns, including Near Neighbor, Ring, All-to-All, Divide and Conquer Binomial Tree (DQBT), Fast Fourier Transform (FFT), One-to-All, All-to-One, and Random. The allocation algorithms investigated include the contiguous First Fit (FF) and Best Fit (BF) and the noncontiguous Paging(0), Greedy Available Busy List (GABL) and Multiple Buddy Strategy (MBS). In near neighbor, FFT and DQBT, the simulation results show that the performance of contiguous allocation is dramatically better than that of the noncontiguous allocation in terms of response time; except for MBS in DQBT. In All-to-All, the results show that the performance of contiguous FF and BF is better than that of the noncontiguous MBS.
二维网格互连网络中基于通用通信模式的连续与不连续处理器分配性能评价
一些处理器分配研究表明,非连续分配的性能明显优于连续分配,但这并不总是正确的。通信模式对处理器分配算法的性能有很大的影响。本文基于几种通信模式,包括近邻、环、全对全、分而治之二叉树(dbbt)、快速傅立叶变换(FFT)、一对所有(One-to-All)、全对一(All-to-One)和随机,重新考虑了知名分配算法的性能。研究的分配算法包括连续的首次匹配(FF)和最佳匹配(BF)以及不连续的分页(0)、贪婪的可用忙列表(GABL)和多伙伴策略(MBS)。仿真结果表明,在近邻、FFT和DQBT中,连续分配的性能在响应时间上明显优于非连续分配;DQBT中的MBS除外。在All-to-All中,结果表明连续的FF和BF的性能优于非连续的MBS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信