Testing the Effectiveness of CNN and GNN and Exploring the Influence of Different Channels on Decoding Covert Speech from EEG Signals: CNN and GNN on Decoding Covert Speech from EEG Signals

Serena Liu, Jonathan H. Chan
{"title":"Testing the Effectiveness of CNN and GNN and Exploring the Influence of Different Channels on Decoding Covert Speech from EEG Signals: CNN and GNN on Decoding Covert Speech from EEG Signals","authors":"Serena Liu, Jonathan H. Chan","doi":"10.1145/3486713.3486733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, the effectiveness of two deep learning models was tested and the significance of 62 different electroencephalogram (EEG) channels were explored on covert speech classification tasks using time series EEG signals. Experiments were done on the classification between the words “in” and “cooperate” from the ASU dataset and the classification between 11 different prompts from the KaraOne dataset. The types of deep learning models used are the 1D convolutional neural network (CNN) and the graphical neural network (GNN). Overall, the CNN model showed decent performance with an accuracy of around 80% on the classification between “in” and “cooperate”, while the GNN seemed to be unsuitable for time series data. By examining the accuracy of the CNN model trained on different EEG channels, the prefrontal and frontal regions appeared to be the most relevant to the performance of the model. Although this finding is noticeably different from various previous works, it could provide possible insights into the cortical activities behind covert speech.","PeriodicalId":268366,"journal":{"name":"The 12th International Conference on Computational Systems-Biology and Bioinformatics","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The 12th International Conference on Computational Systems-Biology and Bioinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3486713.3486733","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, the effectiveness of two deep learning models was tested and the significance of 62 different electroencephalogram (EEG) channels were explored on covert speech classification tasks using time series EEG signals. Experiments were done on the classification between the words “in” and “cooperate” from the ASU dataset and the classification between 11 different prompts from the KaraOne dataset. The types of deep learning models used are the 1D convolutional neural network (CNN) and the graphical neural network (GNN). Overall, the CNN model showed decent performance with an accuracy of around 80% on the classification between “in” and “cooperate”, while the GNN seemed to be unsuitable for time series data. By examining the accuracy of the CNN model trained on different EEG channels, the prefrontal and frontal regions appeared to be the most relevant to the performance of the model. Although this finding is noticeably different from various previous works, it could provide possible insights into the cortical activities behind covert speech.
测试CNN和GNN的有效性,探讨不同通道对脑电信号隐蔽语音解码的影响:CNN和GNN对脑电信号隐蔽语音解码的影响
本文测试了两种深度学习模型的有效性,并探讨了62种不同脑电图(EEG)通道在使用时间序列EEG信号进行隐蔽语音分类任务中的意义。实验对来自ASU数据集的“in”和“cooperation”进行分类,并对来自KaraOne数据集的11个不同提示进行分类。使用的深度学习模型类型是一维卷积神经网络(CNN)和图形神经网络(GNN)。总体而言,CNN模型在“in”和“cooperation”之间的分类上表现不错,准确率在80%左右,而GNN似乎不适合时间序列数据。通过对不同脑电通道训练的CNN模型的准确性进行检验,前额叶和额叶区域似乎与模型的性能最相关。尽管这一发现与之前的各种研究有明显的不同,但它可能为研究隐蔽语言背后的皮层活动提供可能的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信