Load Comparison Between Two Controlling Strategies for Wind Energy Conversion System Power-Boosting

D. Bordeasu, O. Proștean, C. Vașar, Ali Debeş
{"title":"Load Comparison Between Two Controlling Strategies for Wind Energy Conversion System Power-Boosting","authors":"D. Bordeasu, O. Proștean, C. Vașar, Ali Debeş","doi":"10.1109/SACI55618.2022.9919466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explains in detail the development, validation and simulation of a standard PI controller that can boost the WECS (Wind energy conversion system) power through two strategies. In the first strategy, the power is boosted by increasing the generator angular velocity through the direct increase of the angular velocity of the wind turbine rotor by slightly pitching the blades. In the second strategy, the power is boosted by increasing the load torque of the generator, through the direct increase of the load torque of the wind turbine rotor. For achieving this goal, the following tasks have been accomplished: a wind energy conversion system nonlinear mathematical model has been developed, a gain scheduled proportional-integral (PI) controller as the baseline controller, and two gain scheduled proportional-integral (PI) power-boosting controllers for the two power-boosting strategies. For the power-boosting controllers, it is also presented a logic that switches between baseline and power booster controllers when certain wind speeds conditions are met. The response, stability, performance and the increase in the shaft torsion, tower and blades bending moments of the gain scheduled PI power-boosting controllers have been compared with the baseline controller. By comparing the output power response of the controllers, it can be seen that the power booster controllers boost the power when the defined conditions are met. Finally, for boosting the power of a WECS in certain conditions the most efficient way is by increasing the generator load torque, because this strategy increases the least the loading of the main components of a WECS. This power boosting strategy implementation it might require the change (or reinforcement) of the drive train shaft, if it cannot take the extra loading created by power boosting controller.","PeriodicalId":105691,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE 16th International Symposium on Applied Computational Intelligence and Informatics (SACI)","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE 16th International Symposium on Applied Computational Intelligence and Informatics (SACI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SACI55618.2022.9919466","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper explains in detail the development, validation and simulation of a standard PI controller that can boost the WECS (Wind energy conversion system) power through two strategies. In the first strategy, the power is boosted by increasing the generator angular velocity through the direct increase of the angular velocity of the wind turbine rotor by slightly pitching the blades. In the second strategy, the power is boosted by increasing the load torque of the generator, through the direct increase of the load torque of the wind turbine rotor. For achieving this goal, the following tasks have been accomplished: a wind energy conversion system nonlinear mathematical model has been developed, a gain scheduled proportional-integral (PI) controller as the baseline controller, and two gain scheduled proportional-integral (PI) power-boosting controllers for the two power-boosting strategies. For the power-boosting controllers, it is also presented a logic that switches between baseline and power booster controllers when certain wind speeds conditions are met. The response, stability, performance and the increase in the shaft torsion, tower and blades bending moments of the gain scheduled PI power-boosting controllers have been compared with the baseline controller. By comparing the output power response of the controllers, it can be seen that the power booster controllers boost the power when the defined conditions are met. Finally, for boosting the power of a WECS in certain conditions the most efficient way is by increasing the generator load torque, because this strategy increases the least the loading of the main components of a WECS. This power boosting strategy implementation it might require the change (or reinforcement) of the drive train shaft, if it cannot take the extra loading created by power boosting controller.
风能转换系统功率增压两种控制策略的负荷比较
本文详细介绍了一种标准PI控制器的开发、验证和仿真,该控制器可以通过两种策略提高风能转换系统的功率。在第一种策略中,通过轻微俯仰叶片直接增加风力机转子的角速度来增加发电机的角速度,从而提高功率。在第二种策略中,通过直接增加风力发电机转子的负载转矩,通过增加发电机的负载转矩来提高功率。为了实现这一目标,本文完成了以下工作:建立了风能转换系统的非线性数学模型,建立了增益调度比例积分(PI)控制器作为基准控制器,并针对两种功率提升策略分别设置了增益调度比例积分(PI)功率提升控制器。对于功率提升控制器,也给出了在满足一定风速条件时在基线控制器和功率提升控制器之间切换的逻辑。对比了增益计划PI增压控制器的响应、稳定性、性能以及轴扭、塔矩和叶片弯矩的增加情况。通过比较控制器的输出功率响应可以看出,功率升压控制器在满足规定条件时对功率进行升压。最后,在某些条件下,为了提高WECS的功率,最有效的方法是增加发电机负载转矩,因为这种策略增加的WECS主要部件的负载最小。这种动力提升策略的实施可能需要改变(或加强)传动系轴,如果它不能承受由动力提升控制器产生的额外负载。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信