Contesting political theologies of Islam and democracy in Turkey

Sultan Tepe
{"title":"Contesting political theologies of Islam and democracy in Turkey","authors":"Sultan Tepe","doi":"10.1080/20566093.2016.1181386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Turkey’s secularism is often depicted as a system of control par excellence, pitting the secularist state against religion and ignoring the multiplicity of actors within the state as well as within religious sectors. A review of Turkey’s main state institution, the Directorate of Religious Affairs (DRA) explains why models which reduce state–religious relations to a one-dimensional interaction of control or contestation are insufficient. Such models ignore the perplexing support of the DRA by religious groups due to their inability to identify the institution’s dual role in maintaining the presence of Islam in the state structure and lending legitimacy to various religious groups. A pluralistic account of Turkey’s secularism exposes its contradictions, such as DRA decisions that denounced state key secularist policies and the inadvertent outcomes of some state policies limiting Islamic groups. Exposing the paradoxical role of the state vis-à-vis religion the increasing number of woman employees in the DRA unleashed many unexpected changes in the institution, making it more open to once-marginalized women’s groups and their critical theologies, and highlighting the limits of a dichotomous modeling of state–religion relations in Turkey and beyond.","PeriodicalId":252085,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Religious and Political Practice","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Religious and Political Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20566093.2016.1181386","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

Abstract Turkey’s secularism is often depicted as a system of control par excellence, pitting the secularist state against religion and ignoring the multiplicity of actors within the state as well as within religious sectors. A review of Turkey’s main state institution, the Directorate of Religious Affairs (DRA) explains why models which reduce state–religious relations to a one-dimensional interaction of control or contestation are insufficient. Such models ignore the perplexing support of the DRA by religious groups due to their inability to identify the institution’s dual role in maintaining the presence of Islam in the state structure and lending legitimacy to various religious groups. A pluralistic account of Turkey’s secularism exposes its contradictions, such as DRA decisions that denounced state key secularist policies and the inadvertent outcomes of some state policies limiting Islamic groups. Exposing the paradoxical role of the state vis-à-vis religion the increasing number of woman employees in the DRA unleashed many unexpected changes in the institution, making it more open to once-marginalized women’s groups and their critical theologies, and highlighting the limits of a dichotomous modeling of state–religion relations in Turkey and beyond.
伊斯兰教和土耳其民主的政治神学之争
土耳其的世俗主义通常被描述为一种卓越的控制体系,使世俗主义国家与宗教对立,忽视了国家内部以及宗教部门内部行为者的多样性。对土耳其主要国家机构——宗教事务局(DRA)的回顾解释了为什么将国家与宗教关系简化为控制或争论的一维互动的模式是不够的。这种模式忽略了宗教团体对DRA的令人困惑的支持,因为他们无法识别该机构在维持伊斯兰教在国家结构中的存在和为各种宗教团体提供合法性方面的双重作用。对土耳其世俗主义的多元描述暴露了它的矛盾,比如DRA谴责国家主要世俗主义政策的决定,以及一些限制伊斯兰组织的国家政策的无意后果。DRA中越来越多的女性雇员暴露了国家对-à-vis宗教的矛盾作用,在该机构中引发了许多意想不到的变化,使其对曾经被边缘化的妇女团体及其批判神学更加开放,并突出了土耳其内外国家-宗教关系二元模型的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信