ПОРІВНЯЛЬНИЙ АНАЛІЗ СПОСОБІВ ЗАХИСТУ ПРАВ ВЛАСНИКІВ НА ДОМЕННЕ ІМ’Я ТА ТОРГОВЕЛЬНИХ МАРОК

Y. Kovalenko
{"title":"ПОРІВНЯЛЬНИЙ АНАЛІЗ СПОСОБІВ ЗАХИСТУ ПРАВ ВЛАСНИКІВ НА ДОМЕННЕ ІМ’Я ТА ТОРГОВЕЛЬНИХ МАРОК","authors":"Y. Kovalenko","doi":"10.15804/ksm20220105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, the author conducts a comparative analysis of international and Ukrainian legislation in the field of regulation of rights and obligations of trademark owners and domain names, protection mechanisms and their legislative consolidation. The imperfection of the legislative enshrinement of the domain name concept, the consequences of the lack of legal regulation by the state of the legal status of persons who have the right of ownership of the domain name, the lack of legal consolidation of mechanisms for acquiring and terminating domain name ownership and the legal consolidation of trademark and domain name. The differences between the current methods of protection of the right to a domain name in Ukraine and at the international level were revealed, and the prescriptions of the rules governing and resolving domain disputes in international and Ukrainian legal practice were compared. Based on the analyzed legislation, rules and scientific materials, ways to improve the legal status of domain name owners in Ukraine are proposed, including the separation of the domain name as a separate object of intellectual property rights, with typical for intellectual property rights guarantees for protection and enforcement on the domain name on the part of the state, development of the uniform mechanism regulated by the state of registration and acquisition of the property rights to the domain name and separation of legal ways and means of protection of the right to the domain name.","PeriodicalId":431204,"journal":{"name":"Krakowskie Studia Małopolskie","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Krakowskie Studia Małopolskie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15804/ksm20220105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this article, the author conducts a comparative analysis of international and Ukrainian legislation in the field of regulation of rights and obligations of trademark owners and domain names, protection mechanisms and their legislative consolidation. The imperfection of the legislative enshrinement of the domain name concept, the consequences of the lack of legal regulation by the state of the legal status of persons who have the right of ownership of the domain name, the lack of legal consolidation of mechanisms for acquiring and terminating domain name ownership and the legal consolidation of trademark and domain name. The differences between the current methods of protection of the right to a domain name in Ukraine and at the international level were revealed, and the prescriptions of the rules governing and resolving domain disputes in international and Ukrainian legal practice were compared. Based on the analyzed legislation, rules and scientific materials, ways to improve the legal status of domain name owners in Ukraine are proposed, including the separation of the domain name as a separate object of intellectual property rights, with typical for intellectual property rights guarantees for protection and enforcement on the domain name on the part of the state, development of the uniform mechanism regulated by the state of registration and acquisition of the property rights to the domain name and separation of legal ways and means of protection of the right to the domain name.
在本文中,笔者对国际和乌克兰在商标权人和域名权利义务的规制、保护机制及其立法巩固等方面的立法进行了比较分析。域名概念立法吸纳的不完善、国家对域名权利人法律地位缺乏法律规范、域名权属获取与终止机制缺乏法律巩固、商标与域名法律巩固的后果。揭示了乌克兰目前对域名权利的保护方法与国际上的差异,并比较了国际和乌克兰法律实践中管理和解决域名争议的规则规定。在对乌克兰的立法、规则和科学资料进行分析的基础上,提出了改善乌克兰域名所有人法律地位的途径,包括将域名作为单独的知识产权客体分离出来,国家对域名进行典型的知识产权保护和执法保障;建立国家统一规范的域名产权登记取得机制,并将域名产权保护的法律途径和手段分离。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信