Our Common Post-Covid-19 Pandemic Future: A Return to “Normal” or a Creation of the New “Normal”?

P. Čičovački, N. S. Lima
{"title":"Our Common Post-Covid-19 Pandemic Future: A Return to “Normal” or a Creation of the New “Normal”?","authors":"P. Čičovački, N. S. Lima","doi":"10.21146/2074-4870-2022-22-1-112-123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The goal of this paper is to reflect on our common post-Covid-19 future. To do so, we first examine our present pandemic situation in terms of the pairs of the correlated concepts: peace and war, and the normal and the abnormal. We then proceed to analyze the dual aspect of the concept of normal: its descriptive as well as its normative side. In doing so, we con­sider the ethical views of Immanuel Kant, Nicolai Hartmann, Fritz Jahr, and Paul Ricoeur; their views help but do not lead to the solution we find satisfactory. Upon further examina­tion, we come to the realization that our problems with understanding our present and with anticipating our future seem to be ultimately related to our struggle to establish a ground on which both the descriptive and normative aspects of the concept of “normal” can be satisfac­torily founded. Our suggestion is that this problem may be solved by understanding what is normal in terms of health, understood as balance and as finding a proper measure in every­thing we do. Our common post-Covid-19 future should be centered on our renewed commit­ment to the promotion of physical and mental, as well as individual, social, and environmen­tal health. We thus set a stage for further development of an ethics of health.","PeriodicalId":360102,"journal":{"name":"Ethical Thought","volume":"68 5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethical Thought","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21146/2074-4870-2022-22-1-112-123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to reflect on our common post-Covid-19 future. To do so, we first examine our present pandemic situation in terms of the pairs of the correlated concepts: peace and war, and the normal and the abnormal. We then proceed to analyze the dual aspect of the concept of normal: its descriptive as well as its normative side. In doing so, we con­sider the ethical views of Immanuel Kant, Nicolai Hartmann, Fritz Jahr, and Paul Ricoeur; their views help but do not lead to the solution we find satisfactory. Upon further examina­tion, we come to the realization that our problems with understanding our present and with anticipating our future seem to be ultimately related to our struggle to establish a ground on which both the descriptive and normative aspects of the concept of “normal” can be satisfac­torily founded. Our suggestion is that this problem may be solved by understanding what is normal in terms of health, understood as balance and as finding a proper measure in every­thing we do. Our common post-Covid-19 future should be centered on our renewed commit­ment to the promotion of physical and mental, as well as individual, social, and environmen­tal health. We thus set a stage for further development of an ethics of health.
我们共同的后covid -19大流行未来:回归“正常”还是创造新“常态”?
本文的目标是思考我们在2019冠状病毒病后共同的未来。为此,我们首先从和平与战争、正常与异常这对相关概念的角度来审查我们目前的流行病情况。然后,我们继续分析常态概念的双重方面:它的描述性和规范性方面。在此过程中,我们考虑了伊曼努尔·康德、尼古拉·哈特曼、弗里茨·雅尔和保罗·里科尔的伦理学观点;他们的意见有帮助,但没有导致我们感到满意的解决办法。经过进一步的考察,我们认识到,我们在理解我们的现在和预测我们的未来方面的问题,似乎最终与我们努力建立一个基础有关,在这个基础上,“正常”概念的描述性和规范性方面都可以令人满意地建立起来。我们的建议是,这个问题可以通过理解什么是健康的正常,理解为平衡,并在我们所做的每件事中找到适当的衡量标准来解决。2019冠状病毒病后的共同未来应以我们再次致力于促进身心健康以及个人、社会和环境健康为中心。因此,我们为进一步发展健康伦理奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信