An Analysis on the Nature of Morality and Its Social Projections in Durkheim's Sociology

Yunus Polat
{"title":"An Analysis on the Nature of Morality and Its Social Projections in Durkheim's Sociology","authors":"Yunus Polat","doi":"10.55709/tsbsbildirilerdergisi.524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Durkheim, one of the pioneering representatives of the sociological tradition, placed religion and morality at the center of his studies throughout his professional life. Therefore, it would not be wrong to call Durkheim's sociology the sociology of morality. It is important to examine Durkheim's intense interest in morality, his purpose, and implications in order to understand his understanding of morality and his relationship with sociology. Also, this study has not remained indifferent to this interest, and has made it the subject of analyzing the theoretical and practical dimensions of his understanding of morality. Durkheim could not control but focus on the issue of religion. Because morality, which has an important place in the field of social regulations and is one of the key concepts of Durkheim's sociology, largely depends on the reference of religion and is positioned parallel to religion. To understanding Durkheim's sociology does not seem possible without understanding the value he gives to subject of the morality. Durkheim examined an abstract issue such as morality and made it the subject of sociology, which is a modern discipline. On the one hand, Durkheim was influenced by Kant's rational morality, which was free from theological considerations, and on the other hand, he adopted Aristotle's 'ethics', which he called a practical science based on action. The importance of this the study is that Durkheim's theoretical and practical evaluation of the issue of morality is analyzed on the basis of the social reflections of morality and its relationship with religion and society. Durkheim's most characteristic contribution to the sociology of religion is his acceptance of religion as the most important social phenomenon in terms of its effect on collective consciousness and its relation to morality, and his view of society as the basis of social phenomena. According to him, among social phenomena, morality is a social reality, and this reality is not the reality of abstract theories and ideas, but the reality of morality in action. This study aims to analyze the nature of morality in Durkheim's sociology, its necessity, source, continuity, reality, validity, and social manifestations. Moreover, it is aimed to make evaluations and analysis about his sociology and moral understanding as a result of this examination. Within the scope of this study, all of Durkheim's books on morality, which are the accessible in Turkish and English books, especially were examined. The study is presented within the framework of a comparative method by considering the causality and cause-effect relationship between concepts and phenomena. Durkheim, one of the pioneers of the positivist understanding in sociology, is in favor of a rational and secular morality. He struggled to free morality from the dominance of religion and made it the tool of sociology to give it freedom and adapt it to its own age. He turned a phenomenon with abstract, subjective metaphysical aspects into an object of science on a concrete objective rational ground. He used sociology, which he cared enough to call the science of morality, to identify and enforce moral rules. He is a conservative moralist who attaches great importance to social solidarity and integration. He prefers the believers of society to the believers of God. The extreme importance and value he attributed to society is considered sociologism. Durkheimian morality is an ideal secular morality that should be taught to all citizens and substituted as the rules of 'religion', which he calls 'society'. Durkheim attempted to dislocate the relationship between the individual and morality, society and morality, religion and morality, and the organic link in these relationships in rational and secular understanding.","PeriodicalId":286866,"journal":{"name":"TSBS Bildiriler Dergisi","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TSBS Bildiriler Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55709/tsbsbildirilerdergisi.524","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Durkheim, one of the pioneering representatives of the sociological tradition, placed religion and morality at the center of his studies throughout his professional life. Therefore, it would not be wrong to call Durkheim's sociology the sociology of morality. It is important to examine Durkheim's intense interest in morality, his purpose, and implications in order to understand his understanding of morality and his relationship with sociology. Also, this study has not remained indifferent to this interest, and has made it the subject of analyzing the theoretical and practical dimensions of his understanding of morality. Durkheim could not control but focus on the issue of religion. Because morality, which has an important place in the field of social regulations and is one of the key concepts of Durkheim's sociology, largely depends on the reference of religion and is positioned parallel to religion. To understanding Durkheim's sociology does not seem possible without understanding the value he gives to subject of the morality. Durkheim examined an abstract issue such as morality and made it the subject of sociology, which is a modern discipline. On the one hand, Durkheim was influenced by Kant's rational morality, which was free from theological considerations, and on the other hand, he adopted Aristotle's 'ethics', which he called a practical science based on action. The importance of this the study is that Durkheim's theoretical and practical evaluation of the issue of morality is analyzed on the basis of the social reflections of morality and its relationship with religion and society. Durkheim's most characteristic contribution to the sociology of religion is his acceptance of religion as the most important social phenomenon in terms of its effect on collective consciousness and its relation to morality, and his view of society as the basis of social phenomena. According to him, among social phenomena, morality is a social reality, and this reality is not the reality of abstract theories and ideas, but the reality of morality in action. This study aims to analyze the nature of morality in Durkheim's sociology, its necessity, source, continuity, reality, validity, and social manifestations. Moreover, it is aimed to make evaluations and analysis about his sociology and moral understanding as a result of this examination. Within the scope of this study, all of Durkheim's books on morality, which are the accessible in Turkish and English books, especially were examined. The study is presented within the framework of a comparative method by considering the causality and cause-effect relationship between concepts and phenomena. Durkheim, one of the pioneers of the positivist understanding in sociology, is in favor of a rational and secular morality. He struggled to free morality from the dominance of religion and made it the tool of sociology to give it freedom and adapt it to its own age. He turned a phenomenon with abstract, subjective metaphysical aspects into an object of science on a concrete objective rational ground. He used sociology, which he cared enough to call the science of morality, to identify and enforce moral rules. He is a conservative moralist who attaches great importance to social solidarity and integration. He prefers the believers of society to the believers of God. The extreme importance and value he attributed to society is considered sociologism. Durkheimian morality is an ideal secular morality that should be taught to all citizens and substituted as the rules of 'religion', which he calls 'society'. Durkheim attempted to dislocate the relationship between the individual and morality, society and morality, religion and morality, and the organic link in these relationships in rational and secular understanding.
迪尔凯姆社会学中道德的本质及其社会投射分析
迪尔凯姆是社会学传统的先驱代表之一,在他的整个职业生涯中,他都把宗教和道德作为他研究的中心。因此,把迪尔凯姆的社会学称为道德社会学并没有错。为了理解迪尔凯姆对道德的理解以及他与社会学的关系,研究迪尔凯姆对道德的强烈兴趣、他的目的和含义是很重要的。此外,本研究并没有对这种兴趣漠不关心,而是将其作为分析他对道德理解的理论和实践维度的主题。迪尔凯姆对宗教问题的关注是他无法控制的。因为道德在社会规制领域占有重要地位,是迪尔凯姆社会学的核心概念之一,很大程度上依赖于宗教的参照,并与宗教平行定位。要理解迪尔凯姆的社会学,似乎不可能不理解他赋予道德主体的价值。迪尔凯姆考察了道德这样一个抽象的问题,并把它作为一门现代学科——社会学的主题。迪尔凯姆一方面受康德的理性道德的影响,不受神学考虑的影响;另一方面,他又采用了亚里士多德的“伦理学”,他称之为基于行动的实践科学。本研究的重要之处在于,迪尔凯姆对道德问题的理论和实践评价是在道德的社会反思及其与宗教和社会的关系的基础上进行分析的。迪尔凯姆对宗教社会学最具特色的贡献是他接受宗教作为最重要的社会现象,就其对集体意识的影响及其与道德的关系而言,以及他将社会视为社会现象的基础的观点。他认为,在社会现象中,道德是一种社会现实,这种现实不是抽象理论和观念的现实,而是行动中的道德现实。本研究旨在分析迪尔凯姆社会学中道德的本质、必要性、来源、连续性、现实性、有效性和社会表现。此外,本文还旨在对其社会学和伦理学的理解进行评价和分析。在本研究的范围内,迪尔凯姆关于道德的所有著作,特别是在土耳其语和英语的书籍中,都被检查了。本研究是在比较方法的框架内提出的,通过考虑概念和现象之间的因果关系和因果关系。迪尔凯姆是社会学实证主义理解的先驱之一,他主张理性的、世俗的道德。他努力将道德从宗教的支配中解放出来,并使其成为社会学的工具,以使其自由并使其适应自己的时代。他把一个具有抽象的、主观的形而上学方面的现象变成了一个有具体的、客观的理性基础的科学对象。他利用社会学(他非常关心这门学科,称之为道德科学)来识别和执行道德规则。他是一位保守的道德家,非常重视社会的团结和融合。比起上帝的信徒,他更喜欢社会的信徒。他赋予社会的极端重要性和价值被认为是社会主义。迪尔凯姆的道德是一种理想的世俗道德,应该传授给所有公民,并取代为“宗教”的规则,他称之为“社会”。涂尔干试图将个人与道德、社会与道德、宗教与道德的关系,以及这些关系在理性与世俗理解中的有机联系进行错位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信