401(K) Plans: DOL Could Take Steps to Improve Retirement Income Options for Plan Participants

Charles A. Jeszeck, Tamara Cross, Ted Leslie, Tom Moscovitch, David Lin
{"title":"401(K) Plans: DOL Could Take Steps to Improve Retirement Income Options for Plan Participants","authors":"Charles A. Jeszeck, Tamara Cross, Ted Leslie, Tom Moscovitch, David Lin","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2855726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What GAO Found: Workers relying in large part on their 401(k) plan in retirement may not always have a feasible way to make their savings last throughout retirement. Responses to GAO’s non-generalizable questionnaire from 11 401(k) plan record keepers — entities that manage participant account data and transactions for plans — showed that most plans covered by the questionnaire had not adopted products and services that could help participants turn their savings into a retirement income stream (referred to as lifetime income options in this report). Responses to the questionnaire represented more than 40 percent of all 401(k) assets and about a quarter of plans at the end of 2014. GAO found that of the plans covered by the questionnaire, about two-thirds did not offer a withdrawal option — payments from accounts, sometimes designed to last a lifetime — and about three-quarters did not offer an annuity — arrangements that can guarantee set payments for life. \nConcerns about legal risks and record keeper constraints may deter many plan sponsors — typically employers that provide 401(k) plans and establish investment and distribution options — from offering lifetime income options. The Department of Labor (DOL) issues regulations and guidance for plan sponsors and is responsible for educating and assisting them to help ensure the retirement security of workers. For example, DOL has prescribed steps plan sponsors can take to satisfy their fiduciary duties (i.e. act prudently and in the best interest of participants) when selecting an annuity provider for a 401(k) plan. However, according to industry stakeholders GAO interviewed, those steps are not often used because they include assessing “sufficient” information to “appropriately” conclude that the annuity provider will be financially able to pay future claims without definitions for those terms. Without clearer criteria to select an annuity provider, fear of liability may deter plan sponsors from offering annuities. Further, GAO found that a mix of lifetime income options to choose from is not usually available. DOL provides an incentive in the form of limited liability relief to plan sponsors who, among other things, provide participants at least three diversified investment options. However, no such incentive exists for plan sponsors offering a mix of lifetime income options. Without some degree of liability relief, plan sponsors may be reluctant to offer a diverse mix of lifetime income options to their participants. Lastly, stakeholders told GAO that record keepers may make only their own annuities available to the plans they service. DOL provides guidance on selecting service providers, but it does not encourage plan sponsors to seek choices from their service providers, which may prevent plans from having appropriate annuity options available to offer participants. \nRequired minimum distributions (RMD) can offer a default for those who do not choose a lifetime income option by setting a minimum amount of taxable 401(k) income for those age 70 ½ or older, based on life expectancy. Some plan sponsors know how to administer RMDs, and some already choose to provide RMD payments calculated to last a lifetime. However, DOL’s guidance on default lifetime income is focused on a particular annuity type used only by a few plans. By issuing guidance encouraging plans to consider letting RMDs be the default distribution process for retiring participants, DOL may help create lifetime income for participants who do not choose an option. \nWhy GAO Did This Study: As 401(k) plan participants reach retirement they face the challenge of making their savings last for an unknown lifespan, and many 401(k) plan sponsors do not offer options to help participants with this complex task. GAO was asked to review any related challenges and potential changes to help plan sponsors and participants. \nThis report examines, among other things, what is known about the adoption of lifetime income options in 401(k) plans, barriers that deter plan sponsors from offering such options, and the defaults that exist for participants who do not choose a lifetime income option. GAO administered a non-generalizable questionnaire to record keepers, conducted a non-generalizable survey of 54 plan sponsors, and interviewed a range of stakeholders. \nWhat GAO Recommends: GAO makes seven recommendations to DOL, including that it clarify the criteria to be used by plan sponsors to select an annuity provider, consider providing limited liability relief for offering an appropriate mix of lifetime income options, issue guidance to encourage plan sponsors to select a record keeper that offers annuities from other providers, and consider providing RMD-based default lifetime income to retirees. DOL generally agreed, and described actions it would take to address the intent of the recommendations.","PeriodicalId":407792,"journal":{"name":"Pension Risk Management eJournal","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pension Risk Management eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2855726","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

What GAO Found: Workers relying in large part on their 401(k) plan in retirement may not always have a feasible way to make their savings last throughout retirement. Responses to GAO’s non-generalizable questionnaire from 11 401(k) plan record keepers — entities that manage participant account data and transactions for plans — showed that most plans covered by the questionnaire had not adopted products and services that could help participants turn their savings into a retirement income stream (referred to as lifetime income options in this report). Responses to the questionnaire represented more than 40 percent of all 401(k) assets and about a quarter of plans at the end of 2014. GAO found that of the plans covered by the questionnaire, about two-thirds did not offer a withdrawal option — payments from accounts, sometimes designed to last a lifetime — and about three-quarters did not offer an annuity — arrangements that can guarantee set payments for life. Concerns about legal risks and record keeper constraints may deter many plan sponsors — typically employers that provide 401(k) plans and establish investment and distribution options — from offering lifetime income options. The Department of Labor (DOL) issues regulations and guidance for plan sponsors and is responsible for educating and assisting them to help ensure the retirement security of workers. For example, DOL has prescribed steps plan sponsors can take to satisfy their fiduciary duties (i.e. act prudently and in the best interest of participants) when selecting an annuity provider for a 401(k) plan. However, according to industry stakeholders GAO interviewed, those steps are not often used because they include assessing “sufficient” information to “appropriately” conclude that the annuity provider will be financially able to pay future claims without definitions for those terms. Without clearer criteria to select an annuity provider, fear of liability may deter plan sponsors from offering annuities. Further, GAO found that a mix of lifetime income options to choose from is not usually available. DOL provides an incentive in the form of limited liability relief to plan sponsors who, among other things, provide participants at least three diversified investment options. However, no such incentive exists for plan sponsors offering a mix of lifetime income options. Without some degree of liability relief, plan sponsors may be reluctant to offer a diverse mix of lifetime income options to their participants. Lastly, stakeholders told GAO that record keepers may make only their own annuities available to the plans they service. DOL provides guidance on selecting service providers, but it does not encourage plan sponsors to seek choices from their service providers, which may prevent plans from having appropriate annuity options available to offer participants. Required minimum distributions (RMD) can offer a default for those who do not choose a lifetime income option by setting a minimum amount of taxable 401(k) income for those age 70 ½ or older, based on life expectancy. Some plan sponsors know how to administer RMDs, and some already choose to provide RMD payments calculated to last a lifetime. However, DOL’s guidance on default lifetime income is focused on a particular annuity type used only by a few plans. By issuing guidance encouraging plans to consider letting RMDs be the default distribution process for retiring participants, DOL may help create lifetime income for participants who do not choose an option. Why GAO Did This Study: As 401(k) plan participants reach retirement they face the challenge of making their savings last for an unknown lifespan, and many 401(k) plan sponsors do not offer options to help participants with this complex task. GAO was asked to review any related challenges and potential changes to help plan sponsors and participants. This report examines, among other things, what is known about the adoption of lifetime income options in 401(k) plans, barriers that deter plan sponsors from offering such options, and the defaults that exist for participants who do not choose a lifetime income option. GAO administered a non-generalizable questionnaire to record keepers, conducted a non-generalizable survey of 54 plan sponsors, and interviewed a range of stakeholders. What GAO Recommends: GAO makes seven recommendations to DOL, including that it clarify the criteria to be used by plan sponsors to select an annuity provider, consider providing limited liability relief for offering an appropriate mix of lifetime income options, issue guidance to encourage plan sponsors to select a record keeper that offers annuities from other providers, and consider providing RMD-based default lifetime income to retirees. DOL generally agreed, and described actions it would take to address the intent of the recommendations.
401(K)计划:劳工部可以采取措施改善计划参与者的退休收入选择
政府问责局发现:在退休时很大程度上依赖401(k)计划的工人可能并不总是有一个可行的方法来让他们的储蓄持续到退休。11个401(k)计划记录保管人(管理计划参与者账户数据和交易的实体)对GAO的非一般化调查问卷的回应显示,调查问卷所涵盖的大多数计划没有采用可以帮助参与者将储蓄转化为退休收入流的产品和服务(本报告中称为终身收入选项)。截至2014年底,对问卷的回应占所有401(k)资产的40%以上,约占计划的四分之一。政府问责局发现,在调查问卷所涵盖的计划中,约有三分之二的计划不提供提款选项——从账户中付款,有时会持续一生——约有四分之三的计划不提供年金——可以保证终身固定付款的安排。对法律风险和记录管理员限制的担忧可能会阻止许多计划发起人——通常是提供401(k)计划并建立投资和分配选择的雇主——提供终身收入选择。劳工部(DOL)为计划发起人发布法规和指导,并负责教育和协助他们帮助确保工人的退休保障。例如,美国劳工部规定了计划发起人在为401(k)计划选择年金提供商时可以采取的步骤,以履行其受托责任(即谨慎行事,并符合参与者的最佳利益)。然而,根据GAO采访的行业利益相关者,这些步骤并不经常使用,因为它们包括评估“足够”的信息,以“适当地”得出年金提供商在没有这些术语定义的情况下有经济能力支付未来索赔的结论。如果没有更明确的标准来选择年金提供商,对责任的恐惧可能会阻止计划发起人提供年金。此外,政府问责局发现,可供选择的终身收入选择组合通常是不可用的。DOL以有限责任减免的形式为计划发起人提供激励,其中包括为参与者提供至少三种多样化的投资选择。然而,对于提供混合终身收入选择的计划发起人来说,没有这样的激励。如果没有某种程度的责任减免,计划发起人可能不愿意为参与者提供多样化的终身收入选择。最后,利益相关者告诉政府问责局,记录保管人可能只向他们所服务的计划提供他们自己的年金。DOL提供了选择服务提供商的指导,但它不鼓励计划发起人从他们的服务提供商那里寻求选择,这可能会阻止计划为参与者提供适当的年金选择。要求最低分配(RMD)可以为那些不选择终身收入选项的人提供默认值,根据预期寿命为70岁半或以上的人设定最低应纳税401(k)收入。一些计划的发起人知道如何管理RMD,一些已经选择提供RMD支付,计算持续一生。然而,劳工部对默认终身收入的指导只关注少数计划使用的特定年金类型。通过发布指导意见,鼓励计划考虑让rmd成为退休参与者的默认分配流程,DOL可能有助于为没有选择选项的参与者创造终身收入。GAO为什么做这项研究:当401(k)计划的参与者退休时,他们面临着如何让他们的储蓄持续到未知的寿命的挑战,而许多401(k)计划的发起人并没有提供选择来帮助参与者完成这项复杂的任务。政府问责局被要求审查任何相关的挑战和潜在的变化,以帮助计划发起人和参与者。本报告考察了在401(k)计划中采用终身收入选项的已知情况,阻止计划发起人提供此类选项的障碍,以及不选择终身收入选项的参与者存在的默认情况。政府问责局对记录保持者进行了一份非一般化的问卷调查,对54个计划发起人进行了非一般化的调查,并采访了一系列利益相关者。政府问责局建议:政府问责局向劳工部提出了七项建议,包括澄清计划发起人选择年金提供商时使用的标准,考虑为提供适当的终身收入选择组合提供有限责任减免,发布指南以鼓励计划发起人选择从其他提供商提供年金的记录保管人,并考虑为退休人员提供基于rmd的默认终身收入。DOL普遍同意,并描述了为解决建议的意图将采取的行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信