{"title":"Opportunities for Demand Controlled Ventilation","authors":"K. Cooper","doi":"10.1177/109719639702000303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"M ODERN HOUSES HAVE been built more airtight in order to reduce drafts, to avoid condensation damage, and to reduce energy use. However, the increased airtightness has resulted in increased levels of pollutant concentration from building materials and from occupant-related activities. Continuous ventilation is used to improve the indoor air quality in these tightly built houses. However, this continuous ventilation results in high heating and cooling energy losses and high operating energy use due to fans. The high heating energy losses can be reduced if heat recovery is used, however, the heat recovery systems are quite expensive to install. In order to break out of this cycle of creating problems with each new solution, we need a better understanding of the problem. Solutions should be developed that have minimal impact on other systems. The problem consists of two parts: ~ high levels of building airtightness, which, at times, result in inadequate amounts of fresh air being supplied by natural means, to dispose of the missions from ~ pollutant sources A significant fraction of new conventional houses in Canada are sufficiently airtight that some pollutant concentrations are exceeding safe levels [1]. The new National Energy Code for Houses and energy efficient housing programs are encouraging even tighter houses. Houses in the R-2000 pro-","PeriodicalId":435154,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thermal Envelope and Building Science","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thermal Envelope and Building Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/109719639702000303","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
M ODERN HOUSES HAVE been built more airtight in order to reduce drafts, to avoid condensation damage, and to reduce energy use. However, the increased airtightness has resulted in increased levels of pollutant concentration from building materials and from occupant-related activities. Continuous ventilation is used to improve the indoor air quality in these tightly built houses. However, this continuous ventilation results in high heating and cooling energy losses and high operating energy use due to fans. The high heating energy losses can be reduced if heat recovery is used, however, the heat recovery systems are quite expensive to install. In order to break out of this cycle of creating problems with each new solution, we need a better understanding of the problem. Solutions should be developed that have minimal impact on other systems. The problem consists of two parts: ~ high levels of building airtightness, which, at times, result in inadequate amounts of fresh air being supplied by natural means, to dispose of the missions from ~ pollutant sources A significant fraction of new conventional houses in Canada are sufficiently airtight that some pollutant concentrations are exceeding safe levels [1]. The new National Energy Code for Houses and energy efficient housing programs are encouraging even tighter houses. Houses in the R-2000 pro-
M ODERN房屋的建造更加密闭性,以减少通风,避免冷凝损坏,并减少能源使用。然而,密封性的提高导致建筑材料和与居住者有关的活动的污染物浓度增加。连续通风被用来改善这些紧密建造的房屋的室内空气质量。然而,由于风扇的存在,这种持续的通风导致了高的加热和冷却能量损失和高的运行能量消耗。如果使用热回收,可以减少高热量损失,但是,热回收系统的安装费用相当昂贵。为了打破这种每个新解决方案都会产生问题的循环,我们需要更好地理解问题。应该开发对其他系统影响最小的解决方案。这个问题包括两个部分:建筑的高度密闭性,有时会导致自然方式提供的新鲜空气量不足,无法处理来自污染源的污染。在加拿大,相当一部分新的传统房屋的密闭性足够好,以至于一些污染物浓度超过了安全水平。新颁布的《国家房屋能源法》和节能住房项目鼓励更紧凑的房屋。房子在R-2000亲