Neighbourhood Policing and Social Cleansing of Crime in Oke-Ogun Area of Oyo State, Nigeria

Ige James Olateju, O. AdigunFolasade, A. Olajoke
{"title":"Neighbourhood Policing and Social Cleansing of Crime in Oke-Ogun Area of Oyo State, Nigeria","authors":"Ige James Olateju, O. AdigunFolasade, A. Olajoke","doi":"10.7176/jcsd/51-06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper assessed neighbourhood policing and social cleansing of crime in Oke-Ogun area of Oyo State with a view to examining spatial variation in response to crime in the area. Both primary and secondary data were employed. The total households of urban and rural settlements as identified in Oke-Ogun area of Oyo State were 44,421 and 175,568 respectively The sample frame constituted all households in the study area, and five out of 1000 of all the 219,989 total households which approximately amount to 1100 households constituted the sample size, Random sampling was employed in hierarchical selection of 5 0 / 00 of the total households in each settlement type, and a total number of 1100 copies of questionnaires were randomly administered  Descriptive statistics such as percentage and Chi-Square were used to present summary of findings. Findings revealed that higher order security consciousness was displayed in urban area with an insubstantial proportion of households surveyed (13.2%) having no organisation responsible for security in their neighbourhood compared with 22.4% in the rural settlements. At aggregation level, 52% of all respondents in Oke-Ogun agreed with the adequacy of policing out of which 13.6% said that the policing was very adequate and 38.4% said that it was adequate while 48% of all respondents were at variance with the adequacy of policing. The households (49.0%) in the rural areas were cynical about adequacy of policing, while out of 49.0%, 28.9% said that policing was inadequate and 20.1% said that policing was very inadequate. The chi-square performed across settlement types at (P<0.05) indicates that the difference in adequacy of policing was significant.  The implication of this is that there is a significant difference between perception of adequacy of policing by households and the settlement types in Oke-Ogun. Households also held view that Police in Oke-Ogun did not give a prompt response expected in situations of distress call. Response to unwillingness to give prompt response to distress call by Police was on top gear in rural settlements. About 39% of all respondents in rural areas said that Police gave prompt response needed to distress call compared to 41.7% in urban areas of Oke-Ogun. For social cleansing job provision for the unemployed was ranked first by the residents among alternatives for keeping neighbourhood safe, followed by imposition of fine on offender.  Jailing of offender was ranked third and equip vigilant groups was ranked fourth Improved infrastructure was ranked fifth among several options. The chi-square analysis performed (P<0.05) indicated that the difference in households’ preference for means of keeping neighbourhood safe across settlement type was significant. The study concluded that response to crime in the area varied spatially. Keywords: Crime, Neighbourhood, Policing, Social cleansing DOI : 10.7176/JCSD/51-06 Publication date :September 30 th 2019","PeriodicalId":326484,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Culture, Society and Development","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Culture, Society and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7176/jcsd/51-06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper assessed neighbourhood policing and social cleansing of crime in Oke-Ogun area of Oyo State with a view to examining spatial variation in response to crime in the area. Both primary and secondary data were employed. The total households of urban and rural settlements as identified in Oke-Ogun area of Oyo State were 44,421 and 175,568 respectively The sample frame constituted all households in the study area, and five out of 1000 of all the 219,989 total households which approximately amount to 1100 households constituted the sample size, Random sampling was employed in hierarchical selection of 5 0 / 00 of the total households in each settlement type, and a total number of 1100 copies of questionnaires were randomly administered  Descriptive statistics such as percentage and Chi-Square were used to present summary of findings. Findings revealed that higher order security consciousness was displayed in urban area with an insubstantial proportion of households surveyed (13.2%) having no organisation responsible for security in their neighbourhood compared with 22.4% in the rural settlements. At aggregation level, 52% of all respondents in Oke-Ogun agreed with the adequacy of policing out of which 13.6% said that the policing was very adequate and 38.4% said that it was adequate while 48% of all respondents were at variance with the adequacy of policing. The households (49.0%) in the rural areas were cynical about adequacy of policing, while out of 49.0%, 28.9% said that policing was inadequate and 20.1% said that policing was very inadequate. The chi-square performed across settlement types at (P<0.05) indicates that the difference in adequacy of policing was significant.  The implication of this is that there is a significant difference between perception of adequacy of policing by households and the settlement types in Oke-Ogun. Households also held view that Police in Oke-Ogun did not give a prompt response expected in situations of distress call. Response to unwillingness to give prompt response to distress call by Police was on top gear in rural settlements. About 39% of all respondents in rural areas said that Police gave prompt response needed to distress call compared to 41.7% in urban areas of Oke-Ogun. For social cleansing job provision for the unemployed was ranked first by the residents among alternatives for keeping neighbourhood safe, followed by imposition of fine on offender.  Jailing of offender was ranked third and equip vigilant groups was ranked fourth Improved infrastructure was ranked fifth among several options. The chi-square analysis performed (P<0.05) indicated that the difference in households’ preference for means of keeping neighbourhood safe across settlement type was significant. The study concluded that response to crime in the area varied spatially. Keywords: Crime, Neighbourhood, Policing, Social cleansing DOI : 10.7176/JCSD/51-06 Publication date :September 30 th 2019
尼日利亚奥约州奥克-奥贡地区的邻里治安和犯罪的社会清洗
该文件评估了奥约州奥克-奥贡地区的社区治安和社会犯罪清洗,以期审查该地区应对犯罪的空间差异。采用了第一手资料和第二手资料。奥约州奥克-奥贡地区确定的城镇和农村聚落户数分别为44,421户和175,568户,样本框架构成了研究区域的全部家庭,在全部219,989户家庭中,每1000户中有5户(约为1100户)构成了样本量,采用随机抽样的方法,在每个聚落类型的总户数中抽取50 / 00户进行分层选择。随机抽取问卷1100份,采用百分率、卡方等描述性统计对调查结果进行总结。调查结果显示,城市地区显示出更高的秩序安全意识,与22.4%的农村住区相比,在接受调查的家庭中,没有组织负责社区安全的比例很小(13.2%)。在总体水平上,奥克-奥贡所有受访者中有52%同意警务的充分性,其中13.6%表示警务非常充足,38.4%表示足够,而48%的受访者对警务的充分性持不同意见。农村地区的家庭(49.0%)对警察是否足够持怀疑态度,而在49.0%的家庭中,28.9%的家庭认为警察不足,20.1%的家庭认为警察非常不足。不同聚落类型的卡方分析(P<0.05)表明,治安管理的充分性差异显著。这意味着,在奥克-奥贡,家庭对警务充分性的看法与定居点类型之间存在显著差异。住户们还认为,奥克-奥贡的警察没有在遇险呼叫的情况下给出预期的迅速反应。在乡郊地区,警方对遇险电话不愿迅速作出回应的情况日益严重。农村地区约39%的受访者表示,警察对遇险呼叫作出了迅速反应,而奥克-奥贡城市地区的这一比例为41.7%。在社会清洁方面,为失业者提供工作是居民们在维护社区安全的备选方案中排名第一的,其次是对违规者征收罚款。在几个选项中,监禁罪犯排名第三,装备警戒小组排名第四,改善基础设施排名第五。卡方分析(P<0.05)表明,不同聚落类型的居民对邻里安全保护手段的偏好差异显著。研究得出的结论是,该地区对犯罪的反应在空间上存在差异。关键词:犯罪,邻里,治安,社会净化DOI: 10.7176/JCSD/51-06出版日期:2019年9月30日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信