Exploring pedagogical content knowledge of physics instructors using the force concept inventory

A. Maries, C. Singh
{"title":"Exploring pedagogical content knowledge of physics instructors using the force concept inventory","authors":"A. Maries, C. Singh","doi":"10.1063/1.5110146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Force Concept Inventory (FCI) has been widely used to assess student understanding of introductory mechanics concepts by educators and physics education researchers. Many of the items on the FCI have strong distractor choices corresponding to students' alternate conceptions in mechanics. Instruction is unlikely to be effective if instructors do not explicitly take into account students' initial knowledge state in their instructional design. We discuss research involving the FCI to evaluate the pedagogical content knowledge of instructors of varying teaching experience. For each item on the FCI, instructors were asked to identify the most common incorrect answer choice of introductory physics students. We also discussed the responses individually with some instructors. Then we used the FCI pre-test and post-test data from a large population (~900) of introductory students to assess the pedagogical content knowledge of the physics instructors related to the FCI. While the physics instructors, on average, performance better than random guessing at identifying introductory students' difficulties with FCI content, they did not identify many common difficulties of introductory physics students. Moreover, the ability to correctly identify students' difficulties was not correlated with the teaching experience of instructors.","PeriodicalId":183678,"journal":{"name":"WOMEN IN PHYSICS: 6th IUPAP International Conference on Women in Physics","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WOMEN IN PHYSICS: 6th IUPAP International Conference on Women in Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5110146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The Force Concept Inventory (FCI) has been widely used to assess student understanding of introductory mechanics concepts by educators and physics education researchers. Many of the items on the FCI have strong distractor choices corresponding to students' alternate conceptions in mechanics. Instruction is unlikely to be effective if instructors do not explicitly take into account students' initial knowledge state in their instructional design. We discuss research involving the FCI to evaluate the pedagogical content knowledge of instructors of varying teaching experience. For each item on the FCI, instructors were asked to identify the most common incorrect answer choice of introductory physics students. We also discussed the responses individually with some instructors. Then we used the FCI pre-test and post-test data from a large population (~900) of introductory students to assess the pedagogical content knowledge of the physics instructors related to the FCI. While the physics instructors, on average, performance better than random guessing at identifying introductory students' difficulties with FCI content, they did not identify many common difficulties of introductory physics students. Moreover, the ability to correctly identify students' difficulties was not correlated with the teaching experience of instructors.
运用力概念量表探索物理教师的教学内容知识
力概念量表(FCI)被教育工作者和物理教育研究者广泛用于评估学生对力学入门概念的理解。FCI上的许多项目都有很强的干扰选择,与学生对力学的交替概念相对应。如果教师在教学设计中没有明确考虑学生的初始知识状态,教学就不可能有效。我们讨论了运用FCI来评估不同教学经验的教师的教学内容知识的研究。对于FCI上的每一个项目,教师被要求找出入门物理学生最常见的错误答案。我们还与一些教师单独讨论了这些回答。然后,我们使用来自大量(约900)入门学生的FCI前测和后测数据来评估物理教师与FCI相关的教学内容知识。虽然平均而言,物理教师在识别入门级学生在FCI内容上的困难方面比随机猜测表现得更好,但他们并没有识别出入门级物理学生的许多常见困难。此外,正确识别学生困难的能力与教师的教学经验无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信