Two sides of the coin: "Asiatic other" Russians vs. "supreme European" Germans

M. Demirtaş
{"title":"Two sides of the coin: \"Asiatic other\" Russians vs. \"supreme European\" Germans","authors":"M. Demirtaş","doi":"10.38154/cjas.0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Russians and Germans have a long history of interactions with each other in which the reforms carried out during the reign of Peter the Great (1672–1725) – the first Russian Tsar – can be regarded as an important turning point. The adoption of a Western understanding in many fields under the reign of Peter the Great led to the emergence of a new type of Russia that grew to become a significant player between the eastern and western parts of Eurasia. It is obvious that, starting in the era of Peter the Great and continuing under the subsequent Tsars and Tsarinas, in the light of the continuing intimate relations with the European world, German culture and German philosophy have maintained a considerable position in the Russian state and society. Have all these reforms, however, made Russia a true member of the European family in the eyes of the “supreme” Western leaders? While keeping this question in mind, the intention in this article is to focus on the other side of the coin in terms of the relationships between Germans and Russians. To this end, taking the Euro-centrist line as the main catalyst, the approach to Russia here is not based on its well-known aggressive and expansionist identity, but rather its status as a target and victim of the enmity of a “European” power, predominantly the German political and intellectual elite of the 19th and early 20th centuries.","PeriodicalId":330439,"journal":{"name":"Cappadocia Journal of Area Studies (CJAS), Cappadocia University","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cappadocia Journal of Area Studies (CJAS), Cappadocia University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38154/cjas.0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Russians and Germans have a long history of interactions with each other in which the reforms carried out during the reign of Peter the Great (1672–1725) – the first Russian Tsar – can be regarded as an important turning point. The adoption of a Western understanding in many fields under the reign of Peter the Great led to the emergence of a new type of Russia that grew to become a significant player between the eastern and western parts of Eurasia. It is obvious that, starting in the era of Peter the Great and continuing under the subsequent Tsars and Tsarinas, in the light of the continuing intimate relations with the European world, German culture and German philosophy have maintained a considerable position in the Russian state and society. Have all these reforms, however, made Russia a true member of the European family in the eyes of the “supreme” Western leaders? While keeping this question in mind, the intention in this article is to focus on the other side of the coin in terms of the relationships between Germans and Russians. To this end, taking the Euro-centrist line as the main catalyst, the approach to Russia here is not based on its well-known aggressive and expansionist identity, but rather its status as a target and victim of the enmity of a “European” power, predominantly the German political and intellectual elite of the 19th and early 20th centuries.
硬币的两面:“亚洲其他”俄罗斯人vs。“至高无上的欧洲”德国人
俄罗斯人和德国人之间有着悠久的互动历史,其中彼得大帝(1672-1725)统治时期进行的改革可以被视为一个重要的转折点。彼得大帝是第一位俄罗斯沙皇。在彼得大帝的统治下,在许多领域采用西方的理解导致了新型俄罗斯的出现,并逐渐成为欧亚大陆东西之间的重要参与者。很明显,从彼得大帝时代开始,一直延续到后来的沙皇和沙皇,鉴于与欧洲世界的持续密切关系,德国文化和德国哲学在俄罗斯国家和社会中保持着相当大的地位。然而,所有这些改革是否使俄罗斯在西方“最高”领导人的眼中成为欧洲大家庭的真正成员?在牢记这个问题的同时,本文的目的是关注德国人和俄罗斯人之间关系的另一面。为此,以欧洲中间派路线为主要催化剂,在这里对俄罗斯的做法不是基于其众所周知的侵略和扩张主义身份,而是基于其作为“欧洲”大国(主要是19世纪和20世纪初的德国政治和知识精英)敌意的目标和受害者的地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信