About the inadmissibility of “pilot” charges in pre-trial proceedings in a criminal case

S. Rossinsky
{"title":"About the inadmissibility of “pilot” charges in pre-trial proceedings in a criminal case","authors":"S. Rossinsky","doi":"10.26516/2071-8136.2021.4.121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It investigated the involvement of a person as an accused as an act of criminal prosecution, containing the position of the state prosecution in a criminal case, that is, a criminal-legal claim, which is the subject of an upcoming trial. It is concluded that, proceeding from the grounds provided for by law for attracting a person as an accused, taking into account the doctrinal positions, in accordance with which the accusation is the result of a full, comprehensive and objective investigation of the circumstances of the criminal case and presupposes practically the absolute conviction of the investigator in exposing a person of committing the crime incriminated to him, the author comes to the conclusion that this act of criminal prosecution, as a general rule, should close the main phase of the preliminary investigation, be the logical conclusion of a set of procedural actions aimed at establishing the circumstances included in the subject of proof , and be carried out in anticipation of the transfer of the materials of the criminal case for further consideration to the court. The author analyzes the reasons that predetermined the widespread spread of another, as it were, two-stage practice of pre-trial bringing a person to criminal responsibility, consisting in the issuance of the initial (“pilot”) and final charges. It has been determined that the need for movement and the presentation of a “pilot” accusation is currently associated only with the following from the meaning of Ch. 13 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation, an absolutely unreasonable requirement that a person be in the status of an accused as a legal condition for choosing a preventive measure against him, which was a consequence of attempts made by the Soviet legislator to borrow a number of well-proven pre-revolutionary mechanisms and procedures without their proper adaptation to new at that time realities of criminal court proceedings.","PeriodicalId":126097,"journal":{"name":"Siberian Law Herald","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Siberian Law Herald","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26516/2071-8136.2021.4.121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It investigated the involvement of a person as an accused as an act of criminal prosecution, containing the position of the state prosecution in a criminal case, that is, a criminal-legal claim, which is the subject of an upcoming trial. It is concluded that, proceeding from the grounds provided for by law for attracting a person as an accused, taking into account the doctrinal positions, in accordance with which the accusation is the result of a full, comprehensive and objective investigation of the circumstances of the criminal case and presupposes practically the absolute conviction of the investigator in exposing a person of committing the crime incriminated to him, the author comes to the conclusion that this act of criminal prosecution, as a general rule, should close the main phase of the preliminary investigation, be the logical conclusion of a set of procedural actions aimed at establishing the circumstances included in the subject of proof , and be carried out in anticipation of the transfer of the materials of the criminal case for further consideration to the court. The author analyzes the reasons that predetermined the widespread spread of another, as it were, two-stage practice of pre-trial bringing a person to criminal responsibility, consisting in the issuance of the initial (“pilot”) and final charges. It has been determined that the need for movement and the presentation of a “pilot” accusation is currently associated only with the following from the meaning of Ch. 13 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation, an absolutely unreasonable requirement that a person be in the status of an accused as a legal condition for choosing a preventive measure against him, which was a consequence of attempts made by the Soviet legislator to borrow a number of well-proven pre-revolutionary mechanisms and procedures without their proper adaptation to new at that time realities of criminal court proceedings.
关于刑事案件审前程序中“试点”指控的不可采信性
它调查了一个人作为被告参与刑事起诉的行为,其中载有国家检察机关在刑事案件中的立场,即刑事法律要求,这是即将进行审判的主题。结论是,从法律规定的吸引某人作为被告的理由出发,考虑到理论立场,根据这些立场,指控是对刑事案件的情况进行充分、全面和客观调查的结果,并以调查人员在揭发某人犯下被指控的罪行时实际上绝对确信为先决条件,作者得出的结论是,作为一般规则,这一刑事起诉行为应结束初步调查的主要阶段,是一系列程序行动的合乎逻辑的结论,目的是确定证据主体所包括的情况,并在预计将刑事案件的材料移交法院作进一步审议时进行。作者分析了决定广泛传播另一种审前使人承担刑事责任的两阶段做法的原因,这种做法包括提出初步(“试点”)和最后指控。已经确定,目前需要移送和提出“飞行员”指控只与《俄罗斯联邦刑事诉讼法》第13章的含义有关,这是一个绝对不合理的要求,即一个人必须处于被告地位,作为选择对他采取预防措施的法律条件,这是由于苏维埃立法者企图借用革命前的一些久经考验的机制和程序,而没有使其适当适应当时刑事法庭诉讼的新现实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信