A Study on the Authority to Prepare Commercial Premium Contracts

Young-cheon Seo
{"title":"A Study on the Authority to Prepare Commercial Premium Contracts","authors":"Young-cheon Seo","doi":"10.55029/kabl.2023.47.153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As to whether it is a violation of the “Licensed Administrative Agent ACT” for a licensed real estate agent to prepare a commercial rights contract, the Suwon District Court's Seongnam Branch sentenced on November 11, 2022 Godan 577 stipulates as follows. ① Preparing a consulting contract for the transfer of daycare centers corresponds to a premium contract, and preparing a premium contract corresponds to a “document on rights obligations or proof of facts,” which violates the Licensed Administrative Agent ACT. ② The act of mediating a premium contract and preparing a premium contract does not constitute an intermediary act stipulated in the Licensed Real Estate Agents ACT, so the act of mediating a premium contract and preparing a premium contract violates the Licensed Administrative Agent ACT. ③ If the premium contract and the lease transfer contract are inseparable, it is difficult to conclude that both contracts are inseparable from one contract. ④ These Defendants' actions do not constitute a mistake in the law. However, a premium contract is a contract that must be accompanied by a lease contract, is inseparable from a lease contract, and is effective only when both the premium contract and the lease contract are fulfilled, and the other contract is canceled, invalid, or canceled. Therefore, considering that the preparation of premium contracts is one of the tasks of many licensed real estate agents accompanying lease contracts, premium should be recognized as an object of brokerage, and to clarify this, the Enforcement Decree of the Certified Real Estate Agents Act needs to be revised.","PeriodicalId":399431,"journal":{"name":"Korean Institute for Aggregate Buildings Law","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Institute for Aggregate Buildings Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55029/kabl.2023.47.153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As to whether it is a violation of the “Licensed Administrative Agent ACT” for a licensed real estate agent to prepare a commercial rights contract, the Suwon District Court's Seongnam Branch sentenced on November 11, 2022 Godan 577 stipulates as follows. ① Preparing a consulting contract for the transfer of daycare centers corresponds to a premium contract, and preparing a premium contract corresponds to a “document on rights obligations or proof of facts,” which violates the Licensed Administrative Agent ACT. ② The act of mediating a premium contract and preparing a premium contract does not constitute an intermediary act stipulated in the Licensed Real Estate Agents ACT, so the act of mediating a premium contract and preparing a premium contract violates the Licensed Administrative Agent ACT. ③ If the premium contract and the lease transfer contract are inseparable, it is difficult to conclude that both contracts are inseparable from one contract. ④ These Defendants' actions do not constitute a mistake in the law. However, a premium contract is a contract that must be accompanied by a lease contract, is inseparable from a lease contract, and is effective only when both the premium contract and the lease contract are fulfilled, and the other contract is canceled, invalid, or canceled. Therefore, considering that the preparation of premium contracts is one of the tasks of many licensed real estate agents accompanying lease contracts, premium should be recognized as an object of brokerage, and to clarify this, the Enforcement Decree of the Certified Real Estate Agents Act needs to be revised.
商业保费合同编制权限研究
水原地方法院城南分院于2022年11月11日宣判的高单577号判决书中,对持牌房地产中介编制商业权利合同是否违反《特许行政代理法》的问题做出了如下规定。为日托中心的转让准备咨询合同相当于一份溢价合同,而准备溢价合同相当于一份“权利义务或事实证明文件”,这违反了《特许行政代理人法》。②调解溢价合同和编制溢价合同的行为不构成《持牌房地产经纪人法》规定的中介行为,因此调解溢价合同和编制溢价合同的行为违反了《持牌行政代理人法》。如果溢价合同和租赁转让合同是不可分割的,则很难得出这两个合同是不可分割的。这些被告的行为不构成法律上的错误。但是,溢价合同是必须伴随租赁合同的合同,与租赁合同不可分割,只有在溢价合同和租赁合同都履行,另一合同被撤销、无效或被撤销的情况下才有效。因此,考虑到溢价合同的编制是许多持牌房地产经纪人伴随租赁合同的任务之一,应将溢价视为经纪对象,并为此需要修改《注册房地产经纪人法实施令》。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信