Measured end resistance of CFA and drilled displacement piles in San Francisco Area alluvial clay

T. Siegel, T. J. Day, B. Turner, P. Faust
{"title":"Measured end resistance of CFA and drilled displacement piles in San Francisco Area alluvial clay","authors":"T. Siegel, T. J. Day, B. Turner, P. Faust","doi":"10.1080/19375247.2019.1595993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Continuous Flight Auger (CFA) and drilled displacement (DD) piles in the San Francisco (California, USA) area are typically designed using a combination of side- and end resistances. For moderately-sized buildings, these piles are typically 50 to 100 ft (about 15 to 30 m) in length and often bear in Pleistocene epoch alluvium consisting primarily of clay with interbedded sand seams. It can be unconservative to rely upon the higher consistency sand seams because their depth, thickness, and consistency can vary dramatically over short distances. A more robust design approach assigns an end resistance based on the strength of the clay. The fully mobilised end resistance from fifteen (15) high quality axial compression loading tests performed on cast-in-place piles are compared to the average net cone resistance for one diameter below the pile tip. The comparison suggests that direct estimation of the end resistance using local load testing data will result in higher end resistances than will the conventional bearing factor of 9 times the estimated undrained shear strength derived from the cone penetration test.","PeriodicalId":272645,"journal":{"name":"DFI Journal - The Journal of the Deep Foundations Institute","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DFI Journal - The Journal of the Deep Foundations Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19375247.2019.1595993","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Continuous Flight Auger (CFA) and drilled displacement (DD) piles in the San Francisco (California, USA) area are typically designed using a combination of side- and end resistances. For moderately-sized buildings, these piles are typically 50 to 100 ft (about 15 to 30 m) in length and often bear in Pleistocene epoch alluvium consisting primarily of clay with interbedded sand seams. It can be unconservative to rely upon the higher consistency sand seams because their depth, thickness, and consistency can vary dramatically over short distances. A more robust design approach assigns an end resistance based on the strength of the clay. The fully mobilised end resistance from fifteen (15) high quality axial compression loading tests performed on cast-in-place piles are compared to the average net cone resistance for one diameter below the pile tip. The comparison suggests that direct estimation of the end resistance using local load testing data will result in higher end resistances than will the conventional bearing factor of 9 times the estimated undrained shear strength derived from the cone penetration test.
在旧金山地区的冲积粘土中测量了CFA和钻孔位移桩的端阻力
在旧金山(美国加利福尼亚州)地区,连续螺旋钻(CFA)和钻孔位移(DD)桩通常使用侧阻力和端阻力的组合来设计。对于中等规模的建筑,这些桩的长度通常为50至100英尺(约15至30米),并且通常是更新世时期的冲积层,主要由粘土和互层砂缝组成。依靠高稠度的砂层可能是不保守的,因为它们的深度、厚度和稠度在短距离内会发生巨大变化。一种更稳健的设计方法是根据粘土的强度来分配末端阻力。在现浇桩上进行的15次高质量轴压加载试验中,充分调动的端阻力与桩尖以下一直径的平均净锥阻力进行了比较。对比表明,使用局部载荷测试数据直接估算的端部阻力将比传统的承载系数(9倍于锥贯入试验估算的不排水抗剪强度)更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信