Related Party Transactions in India: Are They Influenced by New Regulatory Framework?

S. Dhar, R. K. Kovid
{"title":"Related Party Transactions in India: Are They Influenced by New Regulatory Framework?","authors":"S. Dhar, R. K. Kovid","doi":"10.17492/VISION.V5I1.13238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The unabating scandals and financial irregularities across the world seem to underline the related party transactions (RPTs) as one of the means corporates attempt to ‘manage’ earnings and divert resources as well. Misuse of RPTs raise questions on the corporate governance mechanisms within the company and the regulatory framework at large. Using the data from secondary sources, this paper attempts to critically analyze as how values and numbers of RPTs have changed over a period from 2010 through 2017 in view of provisions of the new Companies Act 2013 for related party transactions. As per new regime, all RPTs need to be pre-approved by audit committee as well as board of directors, responsible for any non-compliance and non-disclosure of necessary information in the financial statements. The analysis of data of 30 NIFTY companies about the values and number of RPTs, revenue and PBT indicates overall dip in CAGR when compared four years’ data pre- and post-2013 Act. However, application of paired t-test indicates statistically significant change in values, number of RPTs, post the Companies Act 2013. The results support the positive implications of new Act for RPTs in India.","PeriodicalId":249264,"journal":{"name":"VISION : Journal of Indian Taxation","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VISION : Journal of Indian Taxation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17492/VISION.V5I1.13238","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The unabating scandals and financial irregularities across the world seem to underline the related party transactions (RPTs) as one of the means corporates attempt to ‘manage’ earnings and divert resources as well. Misuse of RPTs raise questions on the corporate governance mechanisms within the company and the regulatory framework at large. Using the data from secondary sources, this paper attempts to critically analyze as how values and numbers of RPTs have changed over a period from 2010 through 2017 in view of provisions of the new Companies Act 2013 for related party transactions. As per new regime, all RPTs need to be pre-approved by audit committee as well as board of directors, responsible for any non-compliance and non-disclosure of necessary information in the financial statements. The analysis of data of 30 NIFTY companies about the values and number of RPTs, revenue and PBT indicates overall dip in CAGR when compared four years’ data pre- and post-2013 Act. However, application of paired t-test indicates statistically significant change in values, number of RPTs, post the Companies Act 2013. The results support the positive implications of new Act for RPTs in India.
印度的关联方交易:是否受到新监管框架的影响?
全球范围内不断发生的丑闻和金融违规行为似乎突显出,关联交易(RPTs)是企业试图“管理”收益和转移资源的手段之一。rpt的滥用引发了对公司内部治理机制和整个监管框架的质疑。利用二手来源的数据,本文试图批判性地分析rpt的价值和数量在2010年至2017年期间如何根据2013年新公司法对关联方交易的规定发生变化。根据新制度,所有rpt都需要得到审计委员会和董事会的预先批准,董事会对财务报表中任何不合规和未披露必要信息的行为负责。对30家NIFTY公司关于rpt、收入和PBT的价值和数量的数据分析表明,与2013年法案前后的四年数据相比,复合年增长率总体下降。然而,配对t检验的应用表明,2013年公司法实施后,rpt的值和数量发生了统计学上显著的变化。研究结果支持了印度新法案对RPTs的积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信