Enhancing Science Achievement Utilising an Integrated STEM Approach

A. A. Yaki, R. M. Saat, R. Sathasivam, Hutkemri Zulnaidi
{"title":"Enhancing Science Achievement Utilising an Integrated STEM Approach","authors":"A. A. Yaki, R. M. Saat, R. Sathasivam, Hutkemri Zulnaidi","doi":"10.32890/MJLI2019.16.1.7319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – The integrated science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education has been reported to improve students’ science achievement. Nevertheless, few studies have focused on how this approach affected different ability groups. Lack of equity or the presence of achievement gap can be detrimental because they can reduce medium and low-ability students’ interest in science, which in turn can affect national development. Thus, the purpose of this study is to determine the main and the interaction effects of integrated science, technology, engineering and mathematics (ISTEMA) on students’ science achievement and how this approach affects students with different academic abilities.\nMethodology – The research adopted a 2x3 factorial design. The sample size consisted of 100 Nigerian science students from Year 11. A total of 51 students with different academic abilities (low, medium and high) were assigned randomly to an experimental group. The experimental group was taught genetics using a fivephased iterative ISTEMA process. Pre-test and post-test data were collected using 40 multiple-choice questions adopted from a national high-stakes examination. Analysis of covariance, paired sample t-test and one-way analysis of variance were utilised in the data analysis.\n\nFindings – Findings for research question one revealed a main significant difference in science achievement between year 11 students who learned using ISTEMA and those using traditional methods. No significant interaction effect was observed between the instructional approach and students’ academic abilities, that is, students’ academic abilities and the instructional approach did not interact to enhance students’ achievement. The findings for research question two indicated that high, medium and low academic-ability students benefitted; however, students with low academic abilities had the highest mean gain.\n\n\nSignificance – Findings in this study have revealed empirically that the ISTEMA, as an instructional approach, has the potential to close the academic achievement gap. The findings may also serve as a guide for policymakers to promote STEM education in schools.","PeriodicalId":375345,"journal":{"name":"Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32890/MJLI2019.16.1.7319","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Purpose – The integrated science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education has been reported to improve students’ science achievement. Nevertheless, few studies have focused on how this approach affected different ability groups. Lack of equity or the presence of achievement gap can be detrimental because they can reduce medium and low-ability students’ interest in science, which in turn can affect national development. Thus, the purpose of this study is to determine the main and the interaction effects of integrated science, technology, engineering and mathematics (ISTEMA) on students’ science achievement and how this approach affects students with different academic abilities. Methodology – The research adopted a 2x3 factorial design. The sample size consisted of 100 Nigerian science students from Year 11. A total of 51 students with different academic abilities (low, medium and high) were assigned randomly to an experimental group. The experimental group was taught genetics using a fivephased iterative ISTEMA process. Pre-test and post-test data were collected using 40 multiple-choice questions adopted from a national high-stakes examination. Analysis of covariance, paired sample t-test and one-way analysis of variance were utilised in the data analysis. Findings – Findings for research question one revealed a main significant difference in science achievement between year 11 students who learned using ISTEMA and those using traditional methods. No significant interaction effect was observed between the instructional approach and students’ academic abilities, that is, students’ academic abilities and the instructional approach did not interact to enhance students’ achievement. The findings for research question two indicated that high, medium and low academic-ability students benefitted; however, students with low academic abilities had the highest mean gain. Significance – Findings in this study have revealed empirically that the ISTEMA, as an instructional approach, has the potential to close the academic achievement gap. The findings may also serve as a guide for policymakers to promote STEM education in schools.
利用综合STEM方法提升科学成就
目的-综合科学,技术,工程和数学(STEM)教育已被报道为提高学生的科学成就。然而,很少有研究关注这种方法如何影响不同的能力群体。缺乏公平或存在成绩差距可能是有害的,因为它们会降低中低能力学生对科学的兴趣,从而影响国家发展。因此,本研究的目的是确定综合科学、技术、工程和数学(ISTEMA)对学生科学成就的主要作用和交互作用,以及这种方法如何影响不同学术能力的学生。方法:本研究采用2x3因子设计。样本量由100名尼日利亚11年级理科学生组成。将51名具有不同学术能力(低、中、高)的学生随机分为实验组。实验组使用五阶段迭代的ISTEMA过程进行遗传学教学。测试前和测试后的数据是通过40道选择题收集的,这些选择题来自于一次全国性的高风险考试。资料分析采用协方差分析、配对样本t检验和单因素方差分析。调查结果-研究问题一的调查结果显示,使用ISTEMA和使用传统方法学习的11年级学生在科学成就方面存在显著差异。教学方法与学生学业能力之间没有显著的交互作用,即学生的学业能力与教学方法之间没有交互作用来提高学生的成绩。研究问题二的结果表明,高、中、低学习能力的学生受益;然而,学习能力低的学生的平均收益最高。意义-本研究的发现从经验上揭示了ISTEMA作为一种教学方法,具有缩小学业成绩差距的潜力。研究结果也可以作为政策制定者在学校推广STEM教育的指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信