{"title":"Towards a Proof of the Kalman Conjecture for the Second Order Systems with Time-Delay","authors":"Jingfan Zhang, W. Heath, J. Carrasco","doi":"10.1109/CONTROL.2018.8516827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We believe that second-order systems with time delay satisfy the Kalman conjecture. Recently, we have submitted a paper constructing Zames-Falb multipliers for several cases [1], but a formal proof is still to be developed. This abstract summarises recent development towards a formal proof of the above statement. The construction of the multiplier is irrational, and the proof cannot be developed as in the non-delay case as it uses the pole location of the closed-loop system at the Nyquist gain. Hence a proof would be significantly different from the current proofs provided of the Kalman conjecture for different cases [2]–[4].","PeriodicalId":266112,"journal":{"name":"2018 UKACC 12th International Conference on Control (CONTROL)","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 UKACC 12th International Conference on Control (CONTROL)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CONTROL.2018.8516827","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We believe that second-order systems with time delay satisfy the Kalman conjecture. Recently, we have submitted a paper constructing Zames-Falb multipliers for several cases [1], but a formal proof is still to be developed. This abstract summarises recent development towards a formal proof of the above statement. The construction of the multiplier is irrational, and the proof cannot be developed as in the non-delay case as it uses the pole location of the closed-loop system at the Nyquist gain. Hence a proof would be significantly different from the current proofs provided of the Kalman conjecture for different cases [2]–[4].