Chapter 5. “That These Colonies Are . . . Free and Independent States”

P. Hoffer, W. Hoffer
{"title":"Chapter 5. “That These Colonies Are . . . Free and Independent States”","authors":"P. Hoffer, W. Hoffer","doi":"10.7591/cornell/9781501726071.003.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Even if the Declaration were a legal document announcing the independence of the United States, according to revolutionary constitutional theory no independent state could exist without fundamental law, in this case a constitution of some sort that was ratified by the people. The Revolutionaries agreed that constitutions must precede and empower governments, or the fundamental rule of consent of the governed could not be followed. Congress did not have such a foundation. The last paragraph of the Declaration thus served as a miniature prototype constitution until such time as a more substantial document could be prepared and ratified. The powers that the Declaration gave to the United States, to wage and conclude wars, regulate commerce, and all the other powers that independent states “may of right do” were the very definition of sovereignty. As it happened, they were the most valid factual claims the Declaration made, for Congress were already doing all of them.","PeriodicalId":217492,"journal":{"name":"The Clamor of Lawyers","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Clamor of Lawyers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501726071.003.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Even if the Declaration were a legal document announcing the independence of the United States, according to revolutionary constitutional theory no independent state could exist without fundamental law, in this case a constitution of some sort that was ratified by the people. The Revolutionaries agreed that constitutions must precede and empower governments, or the fundamental rule of consent of the governed could not be followed. Congress did not have such a foundation. The last paragraph of the Declaration thus served as a miniature prototype constitution until such time as a more substantial document could be prepared and ratified. The powers that the Declaration gave to the United States, to wage and conclude wars, regulate commerce, and all the other powers that independent states “may of right do” were the very definition of sovereignty. As it happened, they were the most valid factual claims the Declaration made, for Congress were already doing all of them.
第五章。“这些殖民地是……自由和独立的国家”
即使《独立宣言》是一份宣布美国独立的法律文件,根据革命宪法理论,没有根本的法律,任何独立的国家都不可能存在,在这种情况下,是一部由人民批准的宪法。革命者一致认为,宪法必须先于政府,并赋予政府权力,否则就不能遵循被统治者同意的基本规则。国会没有这样的基础。因此,《宣言》的最后一段是一部微型的宪法原型,直到可以编写和批准一份更实质性的文件为止。《独立宣言》赋予美国发动和结束战争、管理商业以及独立国家“有权行使”的所有其他权力的权力,正是主权的定义。碰巧,这些都是《宣言》提出的最有效的事实要求,因为国会已经在做这些要求了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信