Disassembly complexity and recyclability analysis of new designs from CAD file data

V. Mani, S. Das, R. Caudill
{"title":"Disassembly complexity and recyclability analysis of new designs from CAD file data","authors":"V. Mani, S. Das, R. Caudill","doi":"10.1109/ISEE.2001.924495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is well known that most decisions that effect the end-of-life disposal and recycling of a product are made during the product design phase. The premise of a design for environment (DfE) approach is that product designers will evaluate and improve their designs from an environmental perspective. The authors' survey of designers indicates they are typically overburdened with product functionality and cost reduction objectives. This more or less eliminates any serious DfE analysis, particularly in small and medium sized companies. There is therefore a need for DfE tools that require minimal user input and hence can be run automatically in the shadow of the design process. At MERC, the authors are involved in the development of such a suite of tools, which evaluate several life-cycle analysis dimensions simultaneously. In this paper, they present DfD-Compact, a design tool that evaluates disassembly complexity and material recyclability. The only input data required by this tool is readily extracted from common CAD programs. Specifically, this data includes a part relationship tree, part weight and part material composition. All other data is stored in standardized libraries. The CAD file data does not typically include all the data required to make a detailed analysis. The authors have developed a procedure that is able to use this core data to estimate other product data and then combine this with the library data to generate a reliable DfD-Ratio. This ratio evaluates the product in three dimensions: (i) material separation and recyclability; (ii) unfastening difficulty; and (iii) disassembly accessibility. The DfD-Ratio is measured on an open-ended scale starting from zero, with zero indicating the worst case. The higher the ratio the better the design. This ratio can be used by the designer to compare design alternatives, improve the design, and/or meet minimum DfE objectives. The procedure is illustrated by an example.","PeriodicalId":448468,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment. 2001 IEEE ISEE (Cat. No.01CH37190)","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment. 2001 IEEE ISEE (Cat. No.01CH37190)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISEE.2001.924495","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

It is well known that most decisions that effect the end-of-life disposal and recycling of a product are made during the product design phase. The premise of a design for environment (DfE) approach is that product designers will evaluate and improve their designs from an environmental perspective. The authors' survey of designers indicates they are typically overburdened with product functionality and cost reduction objectives. This more or less eliminates any serious DfE analysis, particularly in small and medium sized companies. There is therefore a need for DfE tools that require minimal user input and hence can be run automatically in the shadow of the design process. At MERC, the authors are involved in the development of such a suite of tools, which evaluate several life-cycle analysis dimensions simultaneously. In this paper, they present DfD-Compact, a design tool that evaluates disassembly complexity and material recyclability. The only input data required by this tool is readily extracted from common CAD programs. Specifically, this data includes a part relationship tree, part weight and part material composition. All other data is stored in standardized libraries. The CAD file data does not typically include all the data required to make a detailed analysis. The authors have developed a procedure that is able to use this core data to estimate other product data and then combine this with the library data to generate a reliable DfD-Ratio. This ratio evaluates the product in three dimensions: (i) material separation and recyclability; (ii) unfastening difficulty; and (iii) disassembly accessibility. The DfD-Ratio is measured on an open-ended scale starting from zero, with zero indicating the worst case. The higher the ratio the better the design. This ratio can be used by the designer to compare design alternatives, improve the design, and/or meet minimum DfE objectives. The procedure is illustrated by an example.
从CAD文件数据分析新设计的拆卸复杂性和可回收性
众所周知,影响产品生命周期结束处理和回收的大多数决策都是在产品设计阶段做出的。环境设计(DfE)方法的前提是产品设计师将从环境的角度评估和改进他们的设计。作者对设计师的调查表明,他们通常对产品功能和降低成本的目标负担过重。这或多或少消除了任何严肃的DfE分析,特别是在中小型公司中。因此,需要DfE工具,这些工具需要最少的用户输入,因此可以在设计过程的阴影下自动运行。在MERC,作者参与了这样一套工具的开发,这些工具可以同时评估几个生命周期分析维度。在本文中,他们提出了DfD-Compact,一种评估拆卸复杂性和材料可回收性的设计工具。该工具所需的唯一输入数据很容易从常见的CAD程序中提取。具体来说,这些数据包括零件关系树、零件权重和零件材料组成。所有其他数据都存储在标准化库中。CAD文件数据通常不包括进行详细分析所需的所有数据。作者开发了一个程序,可以使用该核心数据来估计其他产品数据,然后将其与库数据相结合,以生成可靠的dfd比率。该比率从三个方面评估产品:(i)材料分离和可回收性;(ii)松开难度;(iii)可拆卸性。dpd比率是在一个从零开始的开放式量表上测量的,零表示最坏的情况。比例越高,设计越好。这个比率可以被设计师用来比较设计方案,改进设计,和/或满足最小DfE目标。通过一个例子说明了这个过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信