Uncertainty and disaster recovery: an analysis of victim perceptions utilizing the problematic integration theory

B. Bagley, Candace Forbes Bright, Edward Sayre, Roma Hanks, S. Wraight
{"title":"Uncertainty and disaster recovery: an analysis of victim perceptions utilizing the problematic integration theory","authors":"B. Bagley, Candace Forbes Bright, Edward Sayre, Roma Hanks, S. Wraight","doi":"10.1080/17459435.2022.2099961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Guided by the problematic integration theory, the purpose of this study was to determine what probabilistic and evaluative orientations were formed during post-disaster decision-making following the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill, the 2011 Tuscaloosa Tornado, the 2011 Mississippi Delta flooding, and a pair of tornados in Hattiesburg Mississippi in 2013 and 2017. A series of focus groups were conducted in communities impacted by these disasters. Five different themes emerged when coding the focus group data for probabilistic and evaluative orientations formed: (1) Distrust, (2) Disorientation, (3) Desperation, (4) Disparity, and (5) Disconnection. The broader implications of this study shed light on how people handle personal uncertainty, especially in situations where their lives have been dramatically shifted in a negative way.","PeriodicalId":406864,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Research Reports in Communication","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Research Reports in Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17459435.2022.2099961","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Guided by the problematic integration theory, the purpose of this study was to determine what probabilistic and evaluative orientations were formed during post-disaster decision-making following the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill, the 2011 Tuscaloosa Tornado, the 2011 Mississippi Delta flooding, and a pair of tornados in Hattiesburg Mississippi in 2013 and 2017. A series of focus groups were conducted in communities impacted by these disasters. Five different themes emerged when coding the focus group data for probabilistic and evaluative orientations formed: (1) Distrust, (2) Disorientation, (3) Desperation, (4) Disparity, and (5) Disconnection. The broader implications of this study shed light on how people handle personal uncertainty, especially in situations where their lives have been dramatically shifted in a negative way.
不确定性和灾难恢复:利用问题整合理论对受害者感知的分析
在问题整合理论的指导下,本研究的目的是确定2010年深水地平线漏油事件、2011年塔斯卡卢萨龙卷风、2011年密西西比三角洲洪水以及2013年和2017年密西西比州哈蒂斯堡的两次龙卷风在灾后决策过程中形成的概率和评估取向。在受这些灾害影响的社区进行了一系列焦点小组调查。当对焦点小组数据进行编码以形成概率和评估性取向时,出现了五个不同的主题:(1)不信任,(2)迷失方向,(3)绝望,(4)差距,(5)脱节。这项研究的更广泛的含义揭示了人们如何处理个人的不确定性,特别是在他们的生活以一种消极的方式发生巨大变化的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信