Predicting result quality in Crowdsourcing using application layer monitoring

Matthias Hirth, S. Scheuring, T. Hossfeld, Christian Schwartz, P. Tran-Gia
{"title":"Predicting result quality in Crowdsourcing using application layer monitoring","authors":"Matthias Hirth, S. Scheuring, T. Hossfeld, Christian Schwartz, P. Tran-Gia","doi":"10.1109/CCE.2014.6916756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Crowdsourcing has become a valuable tool for many business applications requiring to meet a certain quality of the results generated by the workers. Therefore, several quality assurance mechanisms have been developed which are partly deployed in commercial crowdsourcing platforms. However, these mechanisms usually impose additional work overhead for the worker, e.g. by adding test questions, or increase the costs for the employer, e.g. by replicating the task for majority decisions. In this work, we analyze the applicability of implicit measurements to objectively estimate the quality of the workers' results. First efforts in this area have already been made by investigating the impact of the task completion time. We extend this research by deploying an application layer monitoring (ALM), which enables monitoring the workers' interactions with our task interface on a much more detailed level. Based on an exemplary use case, we discuss a possible implementation and demonstrate the potential of the approach by predicting the quality of the workers' submission based on our monitoring results. This ALM provides a new way to identify low quality work as well as difficulties in fulfilling the formulated tasks in the domain of Crowdsourcing.","PeriodicalId":377853,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE Fifth International Conference on Communications and Electronics (ICCE)","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE Fifth International Conference on Communications and Electronics (ICCE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CCE.2014.6916756","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

Abstract

Crowdsourcing has become a valuable tool for many business applications requiring to meet a certain quality of the results generated by the workers. Therefore, several quality assurance mechanisms have been developed which are partly deployed in commercial crowdsourcing platforms. However, these mechanisms usually impose additional work overhead for the worker, e.g. by adding test questions, or increase the costs for the employer, e.g. by replicating the task for majority decisions. In this work, we analyze the applicability of implicit measurements to objectively estimate the quality of the workers' results. First efforts in this area have already been made by investigating the impact of the task completion time. We extend this research by deploying an application layer monitoring (ALM), which enables monitoring the workers' interactions with our task interface on a much more detailed level. Based on an exemplary use case, we discuss a possible implementation and demonstrate the potential of the approach by predicting the quality of the workers' submission based on our monitoring results. This ALM provides a new way to identify low quality work as well as difficulties in fulfilling the formulated tasks in the domain of Crowdsourcing.
应用应用层监测预测众包结果质量
众包已经成为许多商业应用程序的一个有价值的工具,这些应用程序需要满足工人产生的一定质量的结果。因此,已经开发了一些质量保证机制,部分部署在商业众包平台上。然而,这些机制通常会给工人带来额外的工作开销,例如,通过增加测试问题,或者增加雇主的成本,例如,通过复制大多数决策的任务。在这项工作中,我们分析了隐式测量的适用性,以客观地估计工人的结果质量。通过调查任务完成时间的影响,已经在这一领域做出了第一次努力。我们通过部署应用层监控(ALM)扩展了这项研究,它可以在更详细的级别上监控工作人员与我们的任务界面的交互。基于一个示例性用例,我们讨论了一种可能的实现,并通过基于我们的监视结果预测工人提交的质量来演示该方法的潜力。该ALM提供了一种新的方法来识别在众包领域中低质量的工作以及在完成既定任务时遇到的困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信