Price Competition, Fluctuations and Welfare Guarantees

Moshe Babaioff, R. Leme, Balasubramanian Sivan
{"title":"Price Competition, Fluctuations and Welfare Guarantees","authors":"Moshe Babaioff, R. Leme, Balasubramanian Sivan","doi":"10.1145/2764468.2764493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In various markets where sellers compete in price, price oscillations are observed rather than convergence to equilibrium. Such fluctuations have been empirically observed in the retail market for gasoline, in airline pricing and in the online sale of consumer goods. Motivated by this, we study a model of price competition in which equilibria rarely exist. We seek to analyze the welfare, despite the nonexistence of equilibria, and present welfare guarantees as a function of the market power of the sellers. We first study best response dynamics in markets with sellers that provide a homogeneous good, and show that except for a modest number of initial rounds, the welfare is guaranteed to be high. We consider two variations: in the first the sellers have full information about the buyer's valuation. Here we show that if there are n items available across all sellers and nmax is the maximum number of items controlled by any given seller, then the ratio of the optimal welfare to the achieved welfare will be at most log n/(n-nmax + 1))+1. As the market power of the largest seller diminishes, the welfare becomes closer to optimal. In the second variation we consider an extended model in which sellers have uncertainty about the buyer's valuation. Here we similarly show that the welfare improves as the market power of the larger seller decreases, yet with a worse ratio of n/(n-nmax + 1). Our welfare bounds in both cases are essentially tight. The exponential gap in welfare between the two variations quantifies the value of accurately learning the buyer's valuation in such settings. Finally, we show that extending our results to heterogeneous goods in general is not possible. Even for the simple class of k-additive valuations, there exists a setting where the welfare approximates the optimal welfare within any non-zero factor only for O(1/s) fraction of the time, where s is the number of sellers.","PeriodicalId":376992,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Sixteenth ACM Conference on Economics and Computation","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Sixteenth ACM Conference on Economics and Computation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2764468.2764493","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

In various markets where sellers compete in price, price oscillations are observed rather than convergence to equilibrium. Such fluctuations have been empirically observed in the retail market for gasoline, in airline pricing and in the online sale of consumer goods. Motivated by this, we study a model of price competition in which equilibria rarely exist. We seek to analyze the welfare, despite the nonexistence of equilibria, and present welfare guarantees as a function of the market power of the sellers. We first study best response dynamics in markets with sellers that provide a homogeneous good, and show that except for a modest number of initial rounds, the welfare is guaranteed to be high. We consider two variations: in the first the sellers have full information about the buyer's valuation. Here we show that if there are n items available across all sellers and nmax is the maximum number of items controlled by any given seller, then the ratio of the optimal welfare to the achieved welfare will be at most log n/(n-nmax + 1))+1. As the market power of the largest seller diminishes, the welfare becomes closer to optimal. In the second variation we consider an extended model in which sellers have uncertainty about the buyer's valuation. Here we similarly show that the welfare improves as the market power of the larger seller decreases, yet with a worse ratio of n/(n-nmax + 1). Our welfare bounds in both cases are essentially tight. The exponential gap in welfare between the two variations quantifies the value of accurately learning the buyer's valuation in such settings. Finally, we show that extending our results to heterogeneous goods in general is not possible. Even for the simple class of k-additive valuations, there exists a setting where the welfare approximates the optimal welfare within any non-zero factor only for O(1/s) fraction of the time, where s is the number of sellers.
价格竞争、波动和福利保障
在不同的市场中,卖主在价格上竞争,价格波动是可以观察到的,而不是趋同于均衡。这种波动在汽油零售市场、航空公司定价和在线消费品销售中都有经验观察到。受此启发,我们研究了一个很少存在均衡的价格竞争模型。尽管不存在均衡,但我们试图分析福利,并将福利保障作为卖方市场力量的函数。我们首先研究了卖方提供同质商品的市场的最佳响应动力学,并表明除了有限数量的初始回合外,福利保证很高。我们考虑两种变化:在第一种情况下,卖方对买方的估值有充分的了解。这里我们展示了,如果所有卖家有n种商品可供选择,并且nmax是任何给定卖家控制的最大商品数量,那么最优福利与实现福利的比值将最多为log n/(n-nmax +1))+1。随着最大销售者的市场支配力的减弱,福利越来越接近最优。在第二种变体中,我们考虑一个扩展模型,其中卖方对买方的估值不确定。在这里,我们类似地表明,随着较大卖家的市场支配力的下降,福利也会提高,但比率(n /(n-nmax + 1))更差。在这两种情况下,我们的福利界限本质上都很紧。这两种变化之间的福利指数差距量化了在这种情况下准确了解买方估值的价值。最后,我们表明,将我们的结果扩展到一般的异质商品是不可能的。即使对于k-可加性估值的简单类别,也存在这样一种设置,即只有在O(1/s)部分时间内,福利在任何非零因素内接近最优福利,其中s是卖家的数量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信