International Evidence on Food Consumption Patterns: An Update Using 2005 International Comparison Program Data

A. Muhammad, J. Seale, B. Meade, A. Regmi
{"title":"International Evidence on Food Consumption Patterns: An Update Using 2005 International Comparison Program Data","authors":"A. Muhammad, J. Seale, B. Meade, A. Regmi","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2114337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a 2003 report, International Evidence on Food Consumption Patterns, ERS economists estimated income and price elasticities of demand for broad consumption categories and food categories across 114 countries using 1996 International Comparison Program (ICP) data. This report updates that analysis with an estimated two-stage demand system across 144 countries using 2005 ICP data. Advances in ICP data collection since 1996 led to better results and more accurate income and price elasticity estimates. Low-income countries spend a greater portion of their budget on necessities, such as food, while richer countries spend a greater proportion of their income on luxuries, such as recreation. Low-value staples, such as cereals, account for a larger share of the food budget in poorer countries, while high-value food items are a larger share of the food budget in richer countries. Overall, low-income countries are more responsive to changes in income and food prices and, therefore, make larger adjustments to their food consumption pattern when incomes and prices change. However, adjustments to price and income changes are not uniform across all food categories. Staple food consumption changes the least, while consumption of higher-value food items changes the most.","PeriodicalId":314250,"journal":{"name":"Food Politics & Sociology eJournal","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"228","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Politics & Sociology eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2114337","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 228

Abstract

In a 2003 report, International Evidence on Food Consumption Patterns, ERS economists estimated income and price elasticities of demand for broad consumption categories and food categories across 114 countries using 1996 International Comparison Program (ICP) data. This report updates that analysis with an estimated two-stage demand system across 144 countries using 2005 ICP data. Advances in ICP data collection since 1996 led to better results and more accurate income and price elasticity estimates. Low-income countries spend a greater portion of their budget on necessities, such as food, while richer countries spend a greater proportion of their income on luxuries, such as recreation. Low-value staples, such as cereals, account for a larger share of the food budget in poorer countries, while high-value food items are a larger share of the food budget in richer countries. Overall, low-income countries are more responsive to changes in income and food prices and, therefore, make larger adjustments to their food consumption pattern when incomes and prices change. However, adjustments to price and income changes are not uniform across all food categories. Staple food consumption changes the least, while consumption of higher-value food items changes the most.
关于食品消费模式的国际证据:使用2005年国际比较计划数据的更新
在2003年的一份报告《关于食品消费模式的国际证据》中,欧洲经济研究所的经济学家利用1996年国际比较计划(ICP)的数据估计了114个国家对广泛消费类别和食品类别的需求的收入和价格弹性。本报告使用2005年ICP数据,对144个国家的两阶段需求系统进行了更新。自1996年以来,在ICP数据收集方面取得了进展,结果更好,收入和价格弹性估计更准确。低收入国家将大部分预算花在食品等必需品上,而富裕国家将大部分收入花在娱乐等奢侈品上。在较贫穷国家,谷物等低价值主食在粮食预算中所占的份额较大,而在较富裕国家,高价值食品在粮食预算中所占的份额较大。总体而言,低收入国家对收入和粮食价格的变化反应更灵敏,因此在收入和价格变化时对其粮食消费模式作出更大的调整。然而,对价格和收入变化的调整在所有食品类别中并不统一。主食的消费变化最小,而高价值食品的消费变化最大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信