The Status of Investor–State Arbitration: Resolving Investment Disputes Under the Transpacific Partnership Agreement

L. Trakman
{"title":"The Status of Investor–State Arbitration: Resolving Investment Disputes Under the Transpacific Partnership Agreement","authors":"L. Trakman","doi":"10.54648/trad2014001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Intense debate is currently brewing over the multistate negotiation of the Transpacific Partnership Agreement (TPPA). The TPPA is likely to be the second largest trade and investment agreement after the European Union, with trillions of investment dollars at stake. However, there is significant controversy and uncertainty over the resolution of investor-state disputes under it. This manuscript evaluates these issues. It concludes with the proposition that states that forsake investor-state arbitrator in favour of domestic courts, among other options, do so at their peril.","PeriodicalId":313622,"journal":{"name":"Transnational Litigation/Arbitration","volume":"9 11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transnational Litigation/Arbitration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/trad2014001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Intense debate is currently brewing over the multistate negotiation of the Transpacific Partnership Agreement (TPPA). The TPPA is likely to be the second largest trade and investment agreement after the European Union, with trillions of investment dollars at stake. However, there is significant controversy and uncertainty over the resolution of investor-state disputes under it. This manuscript evaluates these issues. It concludes with the proposition that states that forsake investor-state arbitrator in favour of domestic courts, among other options, do so at their peril.
投资者-国家仲裁的地位:解决跨太平洋伙伴关系协定下的投资争端
目前围绕跨太平洋伙伴关系协定(TPPA)的多国谈判正在酝酿激烈的辩论。TPPA可能是仅次于欧盟的第二大贸易和投资协议,涉及数万亿美元的投资。然而,在此基础上如何解决投资者与国家之间的纠纷存在很大的争议和不确定性。本文对这些问题进行了评价。它的结论是,在其他选择中,放弃投资者-国家仲裁而选择国内法院的国家,是在承担风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信