Comparative Study of Task Scheduling Algorithms through Cloudsim

R. Pratap, T. Zaidi
{"title":"Comparative Study of Task Scheduling Algorithms through Cloudsim","authors":"R. Pratap, T. Zaidi","doi":"10.1109/ICRITO.2018.8748514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Delivery of reliable services in cloud environment is a major issue. Reliability may be achieved by implementing the fault tolerance. Due to the abundant growth of traffic and service request on cloud datacenters, balancing the load in cloud environment is one of the serious challenges as failure may occur due to increase in power consumption, node failure, machine failure etc. Therefore there is a needof a policy for balancing the load among the datacenters and various solutions to balance the load have been proposed by researchers. Load distributionis the mechanism of dispersal the load between different nodes based on certain parameters such as underloaded(node) and overloaded (node). In this research articlewe have discussed the concept of dispersal of load and then perform a comparative analysis of various task-scheduling policies such as First Come First Serve, Shortest Job First and Round Robin onCloudsim.The simulation results on Cloudsim depicted that RR task-scheduling is much better than the FCFS and SJF whether we are using the Time shared policy or Space shared policy for execution of cloudlet.","PeriodicalId":439047,"journal":{"name":"2018 7th International Conference on Reliability, Infocom Technologies and Optimization (Trends and Future Directions) (ICRITO)","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 7th International Conference on Reliability, Infocom Technologies and Optimization (Trends and Future Directions) (ICRITO)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRITO.2018.8748514","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Delivery of reliable services in cloud environment is a major issue. Reliability may be achieved by implementing the fault tolerance. Due to the abundant growth of traffic and service request on cloud datacenters, balancing the load in cloud environment is one of the serious challenges as failure may occur due to increase in power consumption, node failure, machine failure etc. Therefore there is a needof a policy for balancing the load among the datacenters and various solutions to balance the load have been proposed by researchers. Load distributionis the mechanism of dispersal the load between different nodes based on certain parameters such as underloaded(node) and overloaded (node). In this research articlewe have discussed the concept of dispersal of load and then perform a comparative analysis of various task-scheduling policies such as First Come First Serve, Shortest Job First and Round Robin onCloudsim.The simulation results on Cloudsim depicted that RR task-scheduling is much better than the FCFS and SJF whether we are using the Time shared policy or Space shared policy for execution of cloudlet.
基于Cloudsim的任务调度算法比较研究
在云环境中交付可靠的服务是一个主要问题。可靠性可以通过实现容错来实现。由于云数据中心上的流量和业务请求的大量增长,云环境中的负载均衡是一个严峻的挑战,因为功耗的增加、节点故障、机器故障等可能导致故障。因此,需要一种策略来平衡数据中心之间的负载,研究人员提出了各种负载平衡的解决方案。负载分布是根据欠载(节点)和过载(节点)等一定参数将负载分散到不同节点之间的机制。在这篇研究文章中,我们讨论了负载分散的概念,然后对cloudsim上的各种任务调度策略(如先到先服务、最短作业优先和轮播)进行了比较分析。在Cloudsim上的仿真结果表明,无论是使用时间共享策略还是空间共享策略来执行cloudlet, RR任务调度都比FCFS和SJF要好得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信