Revisited: Haemodynamic Instability and Endocrine Response During Endotracheal Tube-Placement. A Prospective, Randomized Trial Using Topical Lidocaine and a Lightwand
B. Dünges, F. Heid, M. Dauster, U. Strecker, B. Röhrig, A. Brambrink
{"title":"Revisited: Haemodynamic Instability and Endocrine Response During Endotracheal Tube-Placement. A Prospective, Randomized Trial Using Topical Lidocaine and a Lightwand","authors":"B. Dünges, F. Heid, M. Dauster, U. Strecker, B. Röhrig, A. Brambrink","doi":"10.2174/1874321800802010030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Endotracheal intubation via direct laryngoscopy frequently provokes cardiovascular side-effects. Although us- ing a lightwand intubation device reduces laryngeal stimulation, previous reports indicated a similar stress response com- pared to classical laryngoscopy. We hypothesized that endotracheal tube (ET) placement itself elicits haemodynamic in- stability and that topical anaesthesia can attenuate this response. Methods: 30 patients were randomized to three groups (n = 10 each). After induction of general anaesthesia (fentanyl, etomidate, vecuronium) 5 ml of test solution was applied to laryngo-tracheal structures via a lightwand guided EDGAR- Tube ® . Control group received 5 ml saline 0.9%, group lido 1% 5 ml lidocaine 1%, and group lido 2% 5 ml lidocaine 2%. After 2 minutes of bag-mask ventilation lightwand guided ET placement was performed. Invasive systolic arterial pres- sure (SAP, mmHg), heart rate (HR, bpm) and arterial plasma concentrations of catecholamines ((adr)(nor), pcg ml-) were determined. Results: After ET placement control group patients showed increased HR and SAP (meanHR = 15.3; meanSAP = 45.6) compared to both lido groups (� HR: lido1%/2% = 5.8/3.7; � SAP: lido1%2% = 8.7/13.0). Catecholamine concen- trations also increased only in the control group (mean � (adr) = 101.43; � (nor) = 89.41) but not in lido groups (� (adr): lido1%/2% = -12.93/7.05; � (nor): lido1%/2% = -6.61/-30.55). Effect size calculation indicated strong clinical effects of topical lidocaine for almost all variables (ES > 0.8). Conclusion: ET placement into the non-anaesthesized trachea causes haemodynamic and endocrine stress even if direct laryngoscopy is omitted. Topical anaesthesia effectively reduces this response.","PeriodicalId":272376,"journal":{"name":"The Open Anesthesiology Journal","volume":"92 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open Anesthesiology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874321800802010030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
Endotracheal intubation via direct laryngoscopy frequently provokes cardiovascular side-effects. Although us- ing a lightwand intubation device reduces laryngeal stimulation, previous reports indicated a similar stress response com- pared to classical laryngoscopy. We hypothesized that endotracheal tube (ET) placement itself elicits haemodynamic in- stability and that topical anaesthesia can attenuate this response. Methods: 30 patients were randomized to three groups (n = 10 each). After induction of general anaesthesia (fentanyl, etomidate, vecuronium) 5 ml of test solution was applied to laryngo-tracheal structures via a lightwand guided EDGAR- Tube ® . Control group received 5 ml saline 0.9%, group lido 1% 5 ml lidocaine 1%, and group lido 2% 5 ml lidocaine 2%. After 2 minutes of bag-mask ventilation lightwand guided ET placement was performed. Invasive systolic arterial pres- sure (SAP, mmHg), heart rate (HR, bpm) and arterial plasma concentrations of catecholamines ((adr)(nor), pcg ml-) were determined. Results: After ET placement control group patients showed increased HR and SAP (meanHR = 15.3; meanSAP = 45.6) compared to both lido groups (� HR: lido1%/2% = 5.8/3.7; � SAP: lido1%2% = 8.7/13.0). Catecholamine concen- trations also increased only in the control group (mean � (adr) = 101.43; � (nor) = 89.41) but not in lido groups (� (adr): lido1%/2% = -12.93/7.05; � (nor): lido1%/2% = -6.61/-30.55). Effect size calculation indicated strong clinical effects of topical lidocaine for almost all variables (ES > 0.8). Conclusion: ET placement into the non-anaesthesized trachea causes haemodynamic and endocrine stress even if direct laryngoscopy is omitted. Topical anaesthesia effectively reduces this response.