Susanne Bier’s Hollywood Experiments: Things We Lost in the Fire and Serena

M. Molloy
{"title":"Susanne Bier’s Hollywood Experiments: Things We Lost in the Fire and Serena","authors":"M. Molloy","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474428729.003.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"“Susanne Bier’s Hollywood Experiments: Things We Lost in the Fire and Serena” explores the lackluster responses to Bier’s first English-language productions, often referred to as her ‘Hollywood films’. Author Missy Molloy surveys a variety of sources related to the films’ productions and receptions to reveal the challenges Bier faced transitioning to new production contexts. Moreover, while the films demonstrate Bier’s willingness to experiment with unfamiliar genres and production conditions, they also reaffirm her attractions to specific cinematic subjects, images, and narrative scenarios. Thus, these less successful films provide information relevant to the project of tracing Bier’s authorial influence across a body of extremely varied works. Furthermore, the fact that her authorial influence was somewhat muted in her first ‘Hollywood’ films—due to her signing on late in pre-production as well as complications that arose during post-production— indicates that in Bier’s case, early involvement allows her to affect the characters and narratives to the extent that they reflect career-long preoccupations, which manifested in Things We Lost in the Fire and Serena to a degree that didn’t significantly appeal to either her domestic or international audience. The chapter complements Langkjær’s and Agger’s attentions to more successful films by highlighting that Bier’s approach to genre is expansive, even when it does not produce desirable results. Molloy concludes that less effective elements of Bier’s cinematic strategies are results, at least partly, of bad timing. She further argues that reception prejudices played a role in Things We Lost in the Fire and Serena’s failures to land with audiences.","PeriodicalId":375128,"journal":{"name":"ReFocus: The Films of Susanne Bier","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ReFocus: The Films of Susanne Bier","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474428729.003.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

“Susanne Bier’s Hollywood Experiments: Things We Lost in the Fire and Serena” explores the lackluster responses to Bier’s first English-language productions, often referred to as her ‘Hollywood films’. Author Missy Molloy surveys a variety of sources related to the films’ productions and receptions to reveal the challenges Bier faced transitioning to new production contexts. Moreover, while the films demonstrate Bier’s willingness to experiment with unfamiliar genres and production conditions, they also reaffirm her attractions to specific cinematic subjects, images, and narrative scenarios. Thus, these less successful films provide information relevant to the project of tracing Bier’s authorial influence across a body of extremely varied works. Furthermore, the fact that her authorial influence was somewhat muted in her first ‘Hollywood’ films—due to her signing on late in pre-production as well as complications that arose during post-production— indicates that in Bier’s case, early involvement allows her to affect the characters and narratives to the extent that they reflect career-long preoccupations, which manifested in Things We Lost in the Fire and Serena to a degree that didn’t significantly appeal to either her domestic or international audience. The chapter complements Langkjær’s and Agger’s attentions to more successful films by highlighting that Bier’s approach to genre is expansive, even when it does not produce desirable results. Molloy concludes that less effective elements of Bier’s cinematic strategies are results, at least partly, of bad timing. She further argues that reception prejudices played a role in Things We Lost in the Fire and Serena’s failures to land with audiences.
苏珊娜·比尔的《好莱坞实验:我们在火中迷失的东西》和《瑟琳娜》
“苏珊娜·比尔的好莱坞实验:我们在火中失去的东西和瑟琳娜”探讨了比尔的第一批英语作品的平淡反应,这些作品通常被称为她的“好莱坞电影”。作者Missy Molloy调查了与电影制作和接待相关的各种资源,以揭示比尔在过渡到新的制作环境时面临的挑战。此外,虽然这些电影表明了比尔愿意尝试不熟悉的类型和制作条件,但它们也重申了她对特定电影主题、图像和叙事场景的吸引力。因此,这些不太成功的电影提供了与追踪比尔在一系列极其不同的作品中的作者影响相关的信息。此外,在她的第一部“好莱坞”电影中,由于她在前期制作后期才签约,以及后期制作过程中出现的并发症,她的创作影响力在一定程度上有所减弱,这表明在比尔的情况下,早期的参与使她能够影响角色和叙事,从而反映出她整个职业生涯的关注。这一点在《迷失在火中》和《瑟琳娜》中得到了体现,但在一定程度上对她的国内或国际观众都没有太大的吸引力。这一章补充了langkæ r和Agger对更成功电影的关注,强调了比尔对类型的方法是广泛的,即使它没有产生理想的结果。莫洛伊的结论是,比尔的电影策略中不太有效的部分原因是,至少部分原因是时机不对。她进一步认为,接受偏见在《迷失在火中》和《塞蕾娜》未能赢得观众的青睐中发挥了作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信