Faith in the Courthouse: Muslims, Law, and Political Belonging in Europe and Canada

M. Adrian
{"title":"Faith in the Courthouse: Muslims, Law, and Political Belonging in Europe and Canada","authors":"M. Adrian","doi":"10.2979/JIMS.2.1.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Increasing diversity is pressing states to re-negotiate the narratives of political membership and the meaning of nationhood. Who belongs, and how one belongs, has been a topic of heated contestation, including in Europe and North America. The following article looks at two cases–R v NS (Supreme Court of Canada) and SAS v France (European Court of Human Rights)–that come to different conclusions as to how far a Muslim woman with a face veil, or niqab, can be included in the public sphere. It is argued that any investigation into how people belong must be complex, multi-perspectival, and must expand traditional notions of civic participation in order to ensure freedom, facilitate religious manifestation, and foster diversity.","PeriodicalId":388440,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Islamic and Muslim Studies","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Islamic and Muslim Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/JIMS.2.1.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:Increasing diversity is pressing states to re-negotiate the narratives of political membership and the meaning of nationhood. Who belongs, and how one belongs, has been a topic of heated contestation, including in Europe and North America. The following article looks at two cases–R v NS (Supreme Court of Canada) and SAS v France (European Court of Human Rights)–that come to different conclusions as to how far a Muslim woman with a face veil, or niqab, can be included in the public sphere. It is argued that any investigation into how people belong must be complex, multi-perspectival, and must expand traditional notions of civic participation in order to ensure freedom, facilitate religious manifestation, and foster diversity.
法院信仰:欧洲和加拿大的穆斯林、法律和政治归属
摘要:日益增长的多样性正迫使各国重新谈判政治成员身份和国家地位的意义。谁属于,一个人如何属于,一直是一个激烈争论的话题,包括在欧洲和北美。以下文章将检视两宗案件,即r诉NS(加拿大最高法院)和SAS诉法国(欧洲人权法院),就戴面纱的穆斯林妇女能在多大程度上被纳入公共领域得出不同的结论。有人认为,任何关于人们如何归属的调查都必须是复杂的、多视角的,并且必须扩展公民参与的传统观念,以确保自由、促进宗教表现和促进多样性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信