{"title":"The Bomber Always Gets Through","authors":"","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvc77n9f.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this chapter, to support the assertion that air power is inherently offensive, Kenneth Walker, in “Driving Home the Bombardment Attack,” argues that in the air, offense dominates defense, and a well-armed and well-flown massed bomber formation can defend against any air-to-air attack. In “Tactical Offense and Tactical Defense,” Frederick Hopkins takes an inductive approach to the question of whether the bomber will always get through. In World War I, only when German defenders concentrated their fighters to British bombers at a ratio of 1.5 to 1 did British attrition rates become too great for sustained operations. Hopkins considers it unlikely such ratios would be achieved in the future given the defender’s dilemma of having to defend everywhere yet also mass forces against an offensive force that could choose the time and location of attack.","PeriodicalId":178294,"journal":{"name":"Lectures of the Air Corps Tactical School and American Strategic Bombing in World War II","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lectures of the Air Corps Tactical School and American Strategic Bombing in World War II","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvc77n9f.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this chapter, to support the assertion that air power is inherently offensive, Kenneth Walker, in “Driving Home the Bombardment Attack,” argues that in the air, offense dominates defense, and a well-armed and well-flown massed bomber formation can defend against any air-to-air attack. In “Tactical Offense and Tactical Defense,” Frederick Hopkins takes an inductive approach to the question of whether the bomber will always get through. In World War I, only when German defenders concentrated their fighters to British bombers at a ratio of 1.5 to 1 did British attrition rates become too great for sustained operations. Hopkins considers it unlikely such ratios would be achieved in the future given the defender’s dilemma of having to defend everywhere yet also mass forces against an offensive force that could choose the time and location of attack.
在本章中,为了支持空中力量天生具有进攻性的论断,肯尼斯·沃克(Kenneth Walker)在《轰回家》(Driving Home the Bombardment Attack)一书中指出,在空中,进攻压倒防御,装备精良、飞行良好的轰炸机编队可以抵御任何空对空攻击。在“战术进攻和战术防御”一书中,弗雷德里克·霍普金斯对轰炸机是否总能通过的问题进行了归纳。在第一次世界大战中,只有当德国守军以1.5比1的比例将他们的战斗机集中在英国轰炸机上时,英国的损耗率才变得过高,无法持续作战。霍普金斯认为这样的比例在未来不太可能实现,因为防守方既要处处防守,又要以大量兵力对付进攻方,而进攻方可以选择进攻的时间和地点。