The Bomber Always Gets Through

{"title":"The Bomber Always Gets Through","authors":"","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvc77n9f.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this chapter, to support the assertion that air power is inherently offensive, Kenneth Walker, in “Driving Home the Bombardment Attack,” argues that in the air, offense dominates defense, and a well-armed and well-flown massed bomber formation can defend against any air-to-air attack. In “Tactical Offense and Tactical Defense,” Frederick Hopkins takes an inductive approach to the question of whether the bomber will always get through. In World War I, only when German defenders concentrated their fighters to British bombers at a ratio of 1.5 to 1 did British attrition rates become too great for sustained operations. Hopkins considers it unlikely such ratios would be achieved in the future given the defender’s dilemma of having to defend everywhere yet also mass forces against an offensive force that could choose the time and location of attack.","PeriodicalId":178294,"journal":{"name":"Lectures of the Air Corps Tactical School and American Strategic Bombing in World War II","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lectures of the Air Corps Tactical School and American Strategic Bombing in World War II","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvc77n9f.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this chapter, to support the assertion that air power is inherently offensive, Kenneth Walker, in “Driving Home the Bombardment Attack,” argues that in the air, offense dominates defense, and a well-armed and well-flown massed bomber formation can defend against any air-to-air attack. In “Tactical Offense and Tactical Defense,” Frederick Hopkins takes an inductive approach to the question of whether the bomber will always get through. In World War I, only when German defenders concentrated their fighters to British bombers at a ratio of 1.5 to 1 did British attrition rates become too great for sustained operations. Hopkins considers it unlikely such ratios would be achieved in the future given the defender’s dilemma of having to defend everywhere yet also mass forces against an offensive force that could choose the time and location of attack.
炸弹客总能通过
在本章中,为了支持空中力量天生具有进攻性的论断,肯尼斯·沃克(Kenneth Walker)在《轰回家》(Driving Home the Bombardment Attack)一书中指出,在空中,进攻压倒防御,装备精良、飞行良好的轰炸机编队可以抵御任何空对空攻击。在“战术进攻和战术防御”一书中,弗雷德里克·霍普金斯对轰炸机是否总能通过的问题进行了归纳。在第一次世界大战中,只有当德国守军以1.5比1的比例将他们的战斗机集中在英国轰炸机上时,英国的损耗率才变得过高,无法持续作战。霍普金斯认为这样的比例在未来不太可能实现,因为防守方既要处处防守,又要以大量兵力对付进攻方,而进攻方可以选择进攻的时间和地点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信