Learning Symbolic Rules over Abstract Meaning Representations for Textual Reinforcement Learning

Subhajit Chaudhury, Sarathkrishna Swaminathan, Daiki Kimura, P. Sen, K. Murugesan, Rosario A. Uceda-Sosa, Michiaki Tatsubori, Achille Fokoue, P. Kapanipathi, Asim Munawar, Alexander G. Gray
{"title":"Learning Symbolic Rules over Abstract Meaning Representations for Textual Reinforcement Learning","authors":"Subhajit Chaudhury, Sarathkrishna Swaminathan, Daiki Kimura, P. Sen, K. Murugesan, Rosario A. Uceda-Sosa, Michiaki Tatsubori, Achille Fokoue, P. Kapanipathi, Asim Munawar, Alexander G. Gray","doi":"10.48550/arXiv.2307.02689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Text-based reinforcement learning agents have predominantly been neural network-based models with embeddings-based representation, learning uninterpretable policies that often do not generalize well to unseen games. On the other hand, neuro-symbolic methods, specifically those that leverage an intermediate formal representation, are gaining significant attention in language understanding tasks. This is because of their advantages ranging from inherent interpretability, the lesser requirement of training data, and being generalizable in scenarios with unseen data. Therefore, in this paper, we propose a modular, NEuro-Symbolic Textual Agent (NESTA) that combines a generic semantic parser with a rule induction system to learn abstract interpretable rules as policies. Our experiments on established text-based game benchmarks show that the proposed NESTA method outperforms deep reinforcement learning-based techniques by achieving better generalization to unseen test games and learning from fewer training interactions.","PeriodicalId":352845,"journal":{"name":"Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.02689","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Text-based reinforcement learning agents have predominantly been neural network-based models with embeddings-based representation, learning uninterpretable policies that often do not generalize well to unseen games. On the other hand, neuro-symbolic methods, specifically those that leverage an intermediate formal representation, are gaining significant attention in language understanding tasks. This is because of their advantages ranging from inherent interpretability, the lesser requirement of training data, and being generalizable in scenarios with unseen data. Therefore, in this paper, we propose a modular, NEuro-Symbolic Textual Agent (NESTA) that combines a generic semantic parser with a rule induction system to learn abstract interpretable rules as policies. Our experiments on established text-based game benchmarks show that the proposed NESTA method outperforms deep reinforcement learning-based techniques by achieving better generalization to unseen test games and learning from fewer training interactions.
基于抽象意义表示的文本强化学习符号规则
基于文本的强化学习代理主要是基于神经网络的模型,具有基于嵌入的表示,学习不可解释的策略,通常不能很好地推广到看不见的游戏中。另一方面,神经符号方法,特别是那些利用中间形式表征的方法,在语言理解任务中得到了极大的关注。这是因为它们的优点包括固有的可解释性,对训练数据的要求较低,以及在不可见数据的场景中可泛化。因此,在本文中,我们提出了一个模块化的神经符号文本代理(NESTA),它结合了通用语义解析器和规则归纳系统来学习抽象的可解释规则作为策略。我们在已建立的基于文本的游戏基准上的实验表明,所提出的NESTA方法优于基于深度强化学习的技术,可以更好地对未见过的测试游戏进行泛化,并从更少的训练交互中学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信