{"title":"The method of Professor O. A. Krasavchikov","authors":"B. Gongalo","doi":"10.21869/2223-1501-2022-12-5-10-27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Relevance. The modern stage of the development of the science of civil law is inextricably linked with the approval by the Ministry of Higher Education and Science of the Russian Federation of a new nomenclature of scientific specialties, according to which the scientific specialty 12.00.03 \"Civil Law, Business Law, family Law, private interna-tional Law\" was replaced by an expanded scientific specialty 5.1.3 \"Private Legal Sciences\". At the same time, the appeal to the methods of conducting scientific research developed by leading scientists, which, undoubtedly, was the Doctor of Law, Professor O.A. Krasavichkov, allows you to enrich the methodology of the science of civil law and not allow, under the influence of the reform of the nomenclature, to lose the specifics of the methodology of conducted civil studies. The article is an updated version of the author's work \"The Method of O.A. Krasavchikov\", published in 2006. The purpose of the study is to formulate a scientific idea of the significance of the scientific heritage of Doctor of Law, Professor O. A. Krasavchikov for civil science. Objectives: to study the specifics of Professor O. A. Krasavichikov's work on the creation of a scientific school, to assess the importance of O. A. Krasavichikov's scientific works for the further development of the science of civil law. The research methodology is represented by a complex of general scientific methods of scientific cognition (analysis, interpretation, formal-logical). Results. The main directions of scientific and professional activity of Professor O. A. Krasavchikov are shown; methodological approaches to the study of the scientific heritage of civil scientists are developed. Conclusion. The scientific heritage of Professor O. A. Krasavchikov is of great importance for the development of civil science and law enforcement practice. The research and development of O. A. Krasavchikov's ideas is an in-dependent direction for study in civil law science.","PeriodicalId":359562,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: History and Law","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: History and Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1501-2022-12-5-10-27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Relevance. The modern stage of the development of the science of civil law is inextricably linked with the approval by the Ministry of Higher Education and Science of the Russian Federation of a new nomenclature of scientific specialties, according to which the scientific specialty 12.00.03 "Civil Law, Business Law, family Law, private interna-tional Law" was replaced by an expanded scientific specialty 5.1.3 "Private Legal Sciences". At the same time, the appeal to the methods of conducting scientific research developed by leading scientists, which, undoubtedly, was the Doctor of Law, Professor O.A. Krasavichkov, allows you to enrich the methodology of the science of civil law and not allow, under the influence of the reform of the nomenclature, to lose the specifics of the methodology of conducted civil studies. The article is an updated version of the author's work "The Method of O.A. Krasavchikov", published in 2006. The purpose of the study is to formulate a scientific idea of the significance of the scientific heritage of Doctor of Law, Professor O. A. Krasavchikov for civil science. Objectives: to study the specifics of Professor O. A. Krasavichikov's work on the creation of a scientific school, to assess the importance of O. A. Krasavichikov's scientific works for the further development of the science of civil law. The research methodology is represented by a complex of general scientific methods of scientific cognition (analysis, interpretation, formal-logical). Results. The main directions of scientific and professional activity of Professor O. A. Krasavchikov are shown; methodological approaches to the study of the scientific heritage of civil scientists are developed. Conclusion. The scientific heritage of Professor O. A. Krasavchikov is of great importance for the development of civil science and law enforcement practice. The research and development of O. A. Krasavchikov's ideas is an in-dependent direction for study in civil law science.
的相关性。民法科学发展的现代阶段与俄罗斯联邦高等教育和科学部批准的科学专业新命名法密不可分,根据该命名法,科学专业12.00.03“民法,商法,家庭法,国际私法”被扩大的科学专业5.1.3“私法科学”所取代。与此同时,对主要科学家(无疑是法学博士克拉萨维契科夫教授)开发的科学研究方法的呼吁,使您能够丰富民法科学的方法论,而不允许在命名法改革的影响下失去进行民事研究的方法论的特殊性。这篇文章是作者2006年出版的《The Method of O.A. Krasavchikov》的更新版。本研究的目的是对法学博士O. a . Krasavchikov教授的科学遗产对公民科学的意义形成科学的认识。目的:研究克拉萨维奇科夫教授关于创建科学学派的具体工作,评价克拉萨维奇科夫教授的科学工作对民法科学的进一步发展的重要性。研究方法论是由科学认知的一般科学方法(分析、解释、形式逻辑)的综合体所代表的。结果。O. A. Krasavchikov教授的科学和专业活动的主要方向如下;发展了研究民间科学家科学遗产的方法学方法。结论。克拉萨夫奇科夫教授的科学遗产对民间科学的发展和执法实践具有重要意义。克拉萨夫奇科夫思想的研究与发展是民法学研究的一个独立方向。