Should the Indebted Support a State Constitutional Amendment to Restrict Public Authority Borrowing?

Scott Fein
{"title":"Should the Indebted Support a State Constitutional Amendment to Restrict Public Authority Borrowing?","authors":"Scott Fein","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3016063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the early 1900s, in the absence of voter approval or often knowledge, the state’s public authorities have given rise to more than 95 percent of the state’s aggregate debt and assumed responsibility for 85 percent of our infrastructure. They serve, many have suggested, as a shadow government. Good government organizations have increasingly urged adoption of a state constitutional amendment to place limits on the ability of the public authorities to borrow in the absence of voter approval. Others respond that fiscal limitations on entities responsible for sustaining the state’s solvency would be ill conceived and could catastrophically impair the state’s access to the capital markets. This chapter examines the issue.","PeriodicalId":125551,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Initiatives & Referenda (Constitutions) (Topic)","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Initiatives & Referenda (Constitutions) (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3016063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the early 1900s, in the absence of voter approval or often knowledge, the state’s public authorities have given rise to more than 95 percent of the state’s aggregate debt and assumed responsibility for 85 percent of our infrastructure. They serve, many have suggested, as a shadow government. Good government organizations have increasingly urged adoption of a state constitutional amendment to place limits on the ability of the public authorities to borrow in the absence of voter approval. Others respond that fiscal limitations on entities responsible for sustaining the state’s solvency would be ill conceived and could catastrophically impair the state’s access to the capital markets. This chapter examines the issue.
债台高筑者是否应该支持州宪法修正案以限制公共权力机构借款?
自20世纪初以来,在缺乏选民支持或通常不知情的情况下,该州的公共当局已经增加了该州总债务的95%以上,并承担了85%的基础设施责任。许多人认为,他们是影子政府。良好的政府组织越来越多地敦促通过一项州宪法修正案,限制公共当局在没有选民批准的情况下借款的能力。其他人则回应称,对负责维持国家偿债能力的实体实施财政限制是欠考虑的,可能会灾难性地损害国家进入资本市场的机会。本章探讨这个问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信