A comparison of the wear and physical properties of silane cross-linked polyethylene and ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene.

H. Sakoda, A. Voice, H. McEwen, G. Isaac, C. Hardaker, B. Wroblewski, J. Fisher
{"title":"A comparison of the wear and physical properties of silane cross-linked polyethylene and ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene.","authors":"H. Sakoda, A. Voice, H. McEwen, G. Isaac, C. Hardaker, B. Wroblewski, J. Fisher","doi":"10.1054/ARTH.2001.27234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cross-linked polyethylenes are being introduced widely in acetabular cups in hip prostheses as a strategy to reduce the incidence of wear debris-induced osteolysis. It will be many years before substantial clinical data can be collected on the wear of these new materials. Silane cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE) was introduced into clinical practice in a limited series of acetabular cups in 1986 articulating against 22.225-mm alumina ceramic femoral heads and showed reduced wear rates compared with conventionally sterilized (gamma irradiation in air) ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE). We compared the wear of XLPE manufactured in 1986 with the wear of UHMWPE manufactured in 1986 in nonirradiated and irradiated forms. In the nonirradiated forms, the wear of XLPE was 3 times less than UHWMPE when articulating against smooth counterfaces. The nonirradiated materials did not show signs of oxidation. In the irradiated forms, only UHMWPE showed high levels of oxidation, and this caused a substantial increase in wear. Antioxidants added to XLPE during processing gave resistance to oxidative degradation. When sliding against scratched counterfaces, the wear of UHMWPE increased by a factor of 2 to 3 times. Against the same scratched counterfaces, the wear of XLPE increased dramatically by 30 to 200 times. This difference may be attributed to the reduction in toughness of XLPE. Clinically, XLPE has been articulated against damage-resistant ceramic heads, and this probably has been an important factor in contributing to reduced wear. New cross-linked polyethylenes differ considerably from XLPE. This study indicates that it is prudent to examine the wear of new polyethylenes under a range of conditions that may occur in vivo.","PeriodicalId":280050,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of arthroplasty","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1054/ARTH.2001.27234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

Cross-linked polyethylenes are being introduced widely in acetabular cups in hip prostheses as a strategy to reduce the incidence of wear debris-induced osteolysis. It will be many years before substantial clinical data can be collected on the wear of these new materials. Silane cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE) was introduced into clinical practice in a limited series of acetabular cups in 1986 articulating against 22.225-mm alumina ceramic femoral heads and showed reduced wear rates compared with conventionally sterilized (gamma irradiation in air) ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE). We compared the wear of XLPE manufactured in 1986 with the wear of UHMWPE manufactured in 1986 in nonirradiated and irradiated forms. In the nonirradiated forms, the wear of XLPE was 3 times less than UHWMPE when articulating against smooth counterfaces. The nonirradiated materials did not show signs of oxidation. In the irradiated forms, only UHMWPE showed high levels of oxidation, and this caused a substantial increase in wear. Antioxidants added to XLPE during processing gave resistance to oxidative degradation. When sliding against scratched counterfaces, the wear of UHMWPE increased by a factor of 2 to 3 times. Against the same scratched counterfaces, the wear of XLPE increased dramatically by 30 to 200 times. This difference may be attributed to the reduction in toughness of XLPE. Clinically, XLPE has been articulated against damage-resistant ceramic heads, and this probably has been an important factor in contributing to reduced wear. New cross-linked polyethylenes differ considerably from XLPE. This study indicates that it is prudent to examine the wear of new polyethylenes under a range of conditions that may occur in vivo.
硅烷交联聚乙烯与超高分子量聚乙烯的磨损和物理性能比较。
交联聚乙烯被广泛应用于髋关节假体的髋臼杯中,作为减少磨损碎片引起的骨溶解的一种策略。在收集这些新材料磨损的大量临床数据之前,还需要许多年时间。1986年,硅烷交联聚乙烯(XLPE)被引入临床实践,用于固定22.225毫米氧化铝陶瓷股骨头的有限系列髋臼杯,与传统灭菌(空气中伽马辐射)超高分子量聚乙烯(UHMWPE)相比,其磨损率降低。我们比较了1986年生产的XLPE和1986年生产的UHMWPE在未辐照和辐照下的磨损情况。在未辐照的情况下,XLPE在光滑表面上的磨损比UHWMPE小3倍。未辐照的材料没有显示出氧化的迹象。在辐照形式中,只有超高分子量聚乙烯显示出高水平的氧化,这导致磨损的大幅增加。在加工过程中加入抗氧化剂,增强了交联聚乙烯抗氧化降解的能力。当在有划痕的表面上滑动时,超高分子量聚乙烯的磨损增加了2到3倍。对于相同的刮伤表面,XLPE的磨损急剧增加了30 ~ 200倍。这种差异可能是由于XLPE的韧性降低。在临床上,XLPE已被连接到抗损伤陶瓷头上,这可能是减少磨损的重要因素。新型交联聚乙烯与交联聚乙烯有很大的不同。这项研究表明,在体内可能发生的一系列条件下检查新聚乙烯的磨损是谨慎的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信