Manual Therapy for Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: A Systematic Review

Hong-ryoul Yoon, Ji-Cheol Jeong, Soon-Doo Kim
{"title":"Manual Therapy for Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: A Systematic Review","authors":"Hong-ryoul Yoon, Ji-Cheol Jeong, Soon-Doo Kim","doi":"10.30581/jcmm.2022.17.2.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of manual therapy in patients with failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS). Methods We searched eight electronic databases from October 2022 and only selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting outcomes for manual therapy in FBSS patients. Included studies were analyzed qualitatively. Results A total of twelve RCTs were included and three studies were meta-analyzed. Manual therapy combined with exercise demonstrated more favorable outcomes in terms of pain reduction compared to exercise therapy only (P<0.01). Some studies reported that manual therapy resulted in low efficacy, while some studies reported that specific manual techniques have a significant effect in pain relief. We, therefore, conclude that several studies have a high risk of bias. Conclusions Findings suggest that manual therapy is a safe and non-invasive, promising option for managing FBSS. However, manual therapy is not the best option in all circumstances; thus, this should be selectively applied by a well-trained practitioner. Further studies such as well-designed, risk-controlled RCTs are required to gain stronger evidence.","PeriodicalId":430318,"journal":{"name":"Korean Society of Chuna Manual Medicine Spine and Nerves","volume":"107 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Society of Chuna Manual Medicine Spine and Nerves","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30581/jcmm.2022.17.2.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of manual therapy in patients with failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS). Methods We searched eight electronic databases from October 2022 and only selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting outcomes for manual therapy in FBSS patients. Included studies were analyzed qualitatively. Results A total of twelve RCTs were included and three studies were meta-analyzed. Manual therapy combined with exercise demonstrated more favorable outcomes in terms of pain reduction compared to exercise therapy only (P<0.01). Some studies reported that manual therapy resulted in low efficacy, while some studies reported that specific manual techniques have a significant effect in pain relief. We, therefore, conclude that several studies have a high risk of bias. Conclusions Findings suggest that manual therapy is a safe and non-invasive, promising option for managing FBSS. However, manual therapy is not the best option in all circumstances; thus, this should be selectively applied by a well-trained practitioner. Further studies such as well-designed, risk-controlled RCTs are required to gain stronger evidence.
背部手术失败综合征的手工治疗:系统综述
目的本研究旨在评估手工疗法治疗失败背部手术综合征(FBSS)的疗效和安全性。方法:我们检索了2022年10月以来的8个电子数据库,仅选择了报告手工治疗FBSS患者结果的随机对照试验(rct)。对纳入的研究进行定性分析。结果共纳入12项随机对照试验,3项研究进行meta分析。与单纯运动疗法相比,手工疗法结合运动疗法在减轻疼痛方面表现出更有利的结果(P<0.01)。一些研究报道手工疗法的效果较低,而一些研究报道特定的手工技术在缓解疼痛方面有显著的效果。因此,我们得出结论,有几项研究存在高偏倚风险。结论:研究结果表明,手工治疗是一种安全、无创、有希望的治疗FBSS的选择。然而,手工疗法并不是所有情况下的最佳选择;因此,这应该由训练有素的从业者有选择地应用。需要进一步的研究,如精心设计的、风险控制的随机对照试验,以获得更有力的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信