A simulator for and results of comparing ABR flow controls for ATM

E.C. Foudriat, K. Maly, M. Hou
{"title":"A simulator for and results of comparing ABR flow controls for ATM","authors":"E.C. Foudriat, K. Maly, M. Hou","doi":"10.1109/ICATM.1998.688196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper describes the design of a simulator capable of investigating a number of ATM flow-control algorithms. The event driven simulator contains a minimum number of component types-queues, connections and routes. The first two are the only participants generating events. The major data elements are packets which logically can contain any number of cells but the simulator provides for packet transport which is statistically similar to that occurring in individual cell transport through a network. The simulator code is written in C++. Two of its mechanisms, overloaded data structures and dynamic assignment of code using pointers to functions allow the simulator to contain any number of flow control algorithms and to select the algorithm to be used. Because of the unique character of the basic simulator components, relational database structures are used for case input and run output. Run output post processing is necessary because network flow-control problems are usually related to particular components when selecting the flow control algorithm and/or parameters to best meet a system's needs. Simulator run time is excellent, with a 7 queue, 5 connection network taking 2-3 second clock time for a 0.5 second run time. Scaling to a component count by an order of magnitude should be very feasible. To demonstrate the simulator's versatility, we provide a comparison of three very different flow control schemes. The first uses fair-share assignment for individual connections at each queue. The second, a threshold queue algorithm does not control individual connections, only the bulk queue load. The third scheme is an adaptive rate-based algorithm. It uses no control at the queue-only measure transport delay at the receiver.","PeriodicalId":257298,"journal":{"name":"1998 1st IEEE International Conference on ATM. ICATM'98","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"1998 1st IEEE International Conference on ATM. ICATM'98","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICATM.1998.688196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper describes the design of a simulator capable of investigating a number of ATM flow-control algorithms. The event driven simulator contains a minimum number of component types-queues, connections and routes. The first two are the only participants generating events. The major data elements are packets which logically can contain any number of cells but the simulator provides for packet transport which is statistically similar to that occurring in individual cell transport through a network. The simulator code is written in C++. Two of its mechanisms, overloaded data structures and dynamic assignment of code using pointers to functions allow the simulator to contain any number of flow control algorithms and to select the algorithm to be used. Because of the unique character of the basic simulator components, relational database structures are used for case input and run output. Run output post processing is necessary because network flow-control problems are usually related to particular components when selecting the flow control algorithm and/or parameters to best meet a system's needs. Simulator run time is excellent, with a 7 queue, 5 connection network taking 2-3 second clock time for a 0.5 second run time. Scaling to a component count by an order of magnitude should be very feasible. To demonstrate the simulator's versatility, we provide a comparison of three very different flow control schemes. The first uses fair-share assignment for individual connections at each queue. The second, a threshold queue algorithm does not control individual connections, only the bulk queue load. The third scheme is an adaptive rate-based algorithm. It uses no control at the queue-only measure transport delay at the receiver.
ATM的ABR流量控制仿真及比较结果
本文介绍了一个能够研究多种ATM流量控制算法的模拟器的设计。事件驱动模拟器包含最少数量的组件类型——队列、连接和路由。前两个是唯一生成事件的参与者。主要的数据元素是数据包,它在逻辑上可以包含任意数量的单元,但模拟器提供的数据包传输在统计上类似于通过网络进行的单个单元传输。模拟器代码是用c++编写的。它的两种机制,重载数据结构和使用指向函数的指针对代码进行动态赋值,允许模拟器包含任意数量的流控制算法并选择要使用的算法。由于模拟器基本组件的独特性,在案例输入和运行输出中使用关系数据库结构。运行输出后处理是必要的,因为在选择流量控制算法和/或参数以最好地满足系统需求时,网络流量控制问题通常与特定组件有关。模拟器的运行时间非常出色,7个队列、5个连接的网络在0.5秒的运行时间内花费2-3秒的时钟时间。按一个数量级缩放到一个组件数量应该是非常可行的。为了演示模拟器的多功能性,我们提供了三种非常不同的流量控制方案的比较。第一种方法对每个队列上的单个连接使用公平共享分配。第二,阈值队列算法不控制单个连接,只控制批量队列负载。第三种方案是基于自适应速率的算法。它在队列中不使用控制,只测量接收端的传输延迟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信