An accelerometer-based objective assessment of spasticity: A simple pendulum model to evaluate outcome measures

Fariborz Rahimi, N. Salahshour, Reza Eyvazpour, M. Azghani
{"title":"An accelerometer-based objective assessment of spasticity: A simple pendulum model to evaluate outcome measures","authors":"Fariborz Rahimi, N. Salahshour, Reza Eyvazpour, M. Azghani","doi":"10.1109/ICBME51989.2020.9319417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Spasticity is one of the common motor disorders that occurs due to upper motor neuron defects in patients such as stroke, spinal cord injury, cerebral palsy, and multiple sclerosis. Its measurement is often done using standardized clinical scales. One of the salient problems associated with this symptom is poor objectivity in its assessment. Several methods have been proposed in the past two decades from which passive joint movement and the Wartenberg pendulum test are the most practical, promising, and sensitive to changes. The purpose of this study was to investigate the capability of accelerometer-based outcome measures in assessment of spasticity through pendulum test. We also aimed at evaluation of sensitivity to choice of sensor on outcome measures’ strength in discriminating levels of spasticity. In this study we have simulated oscillating movement of dropped limb in various levels of spasticity by a simple pendulum and adjustable friction level. Our results show that acceleration-based outcome measures are as strong as angle-based counterparts and can reliably discriminate levels of spasticity in the whole range of severity (87% discrimination index). We also found that choice of accelerometer does not have noticeable effect on the performance of this objective method of spasticity assessment","PeriodicalId":120969,"journal":{"name":"2020 27th National and 5th International Iranian Conference on Biomedical Engineering (ICBME)","volume":"32 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 27th National and 5th International Iranian Conference on Biomedical Engineering (ICBME)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICBME51989.2020.9319417","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Spasticity is one of the common motor disorders that occurs due to upper motor neuron defects in patients such as stroke, spinal cord injury, cerebral palsy, and multiple sclerosis. Its measurement is often done using standardized clinical scales. One of the salient problems associated with this symptom is poor objectivity in its assessment. Several methods have been proposed in the past two decades from which passive joint movement and the Wartenberg pendulum test are the most practical, promising, and sensitive to changes. The purpose of this study was to investigate the capability of accelerometer-based outcome measures in assessment of spasticity through pendulum test. We also aimed at evaluation of sensitivity to choice of sensor on outcome measures’ strength in discriminating levels of spasticity. In this study we have simulated oscillating movement of dropped limb in various levels of spasticity by a simple pendulum and adjustable friction level. Our results show that acceleration-based outcome measures are as strong as angle-based counterparts and can reliably discriminate levels of spasticity in the whole range of severity (87% discrimination index). We also found that choice of accelerometer does not have noticeable effect on the performance of this objective method of spasticity assessment
基于加速度计的痉挛客观评估:一个简单的钟摆模型来评估结果措施
痉挛是由上运动神经元缺陷引起的常见运动障碍之一,如中风、脊髓损伤、脑瘫、多发性硬化症等。它的测量通常使用标准化的临床量表。与此症状相关的一个突出问题是其评估缺乏客观性。在过去的二十年中,已经提出了几种方法,其中被动关节运动和Wartenberg摆试验是最实用、最有前途和对变化最敏感的方法。本研究的目的是通过钟摆试验探讨基于加速度计的结果测量在评估痉挛中的能力。我们还旨在评估传感器选择对结果测量在判别痉挛水平时的强度的敏感性。在这项研究中,我们用一个简单的摆和可调节的摩擦水平模拟了在不同程度的痉挛中肢体的振荡运动。我们的研究结果表明,基于加速度的结果测量与基于角度的结果测量一样强大,并且可以可靠地区分整个严重程度范围内的痉挛水平(87%的区分指数)。我们还发现,加速度计的选择对这种客观的痉挛评估方法的性能没有明显的影响
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信