A plea for lean software process models

Philippe B Kruchten
{"title":"A plea for lean software process models","authors":"Philippe B Kruchten","doi":"10.1145/1987875.1987919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the last 30 years we have tried very hard the rich process models approach, and we have not been extremely successful at it. Maybe we should try \"lean and mean\" software process models, rather than making them \"richer.\" At minimum, we should try to analyze why the rich approaches have not worked; where they failed. Could it be that we were trying to solve the wrong problem? or that the real problems by far overshadow the process model issue? Or maybe the whole construction paradigm we use for software development is not suitable anymore? My position is that we should try the route of very simple software process models, to ensure a wider applicability, greater versatility, and acceptance. Possibly these new process models would be based on other paradigms of software or system development than the \"technical-rational\" construction idea. I would be wary of richer process models.","PeriodicalId":296714,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Software and Systems Process","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Software and Systems Process","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1987875.1987919","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Over the last 30 years we have tried very hard the rich process models approach, and we have not been extremely successful at it. Maybe we should try "lean and mean" software process models, rather than making them "richer." At minimum, we should try to analyze why the rich approaches have not worked; where they failed. Could it be that we were trying to solve the wrong problem? or that the real problems by far overshadow the process model issue? Or maybe the whole construction paradigm we use for software development is not suitable anymore? My position is that we should try the route of very simple software process models, to ensure a wider applicability, greater versatility, and acceptance. Possibly these new process models would be based on other paradigms of software or system development than the "technical-rational" construction idea. I would be wary of richer process models.
对精益软件过程模型的请求
在过去的30年里,我们非常努力地尝试了丰富的过程模型方法,但我们并没有非常成功。也许我们应该尝试“精简”软件过程模型,而不是让它们“更丰富”。至少,我们应该试着分析为什么丰富的方法不起作用;他们失败了。会不会是我们试图解决错误的问题?或者到目前为止,真正的问题掩盖了流程模型问题?或者也许我们用于软件开发的整个构造范式不再适合了?我的立场是,我们应该尝试非常简单的软件过程模型,以确保更广泛的适用性、更大的通用性和可接受性。可能这些新的过程模型将基于软件或系统开发的其他范例,而不是“技术-理性”构造思想。我会对更丰富的过程模型保持警惕。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信