DOES THE TEACHERS’ CONTINUOUS PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT REPRESENT A PRIORITY FOR THE ROMANIAN EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM?

R. Enache
{"title":"DOES THE TEACHERS’ CONTINUOUS PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT REPRESENT A PRIORITY FOR THE ROMANIAN EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM?","authors":"R. Enache","doi":"10.26520/peijes.2022.6.4.43-52","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At present, being involved in a permanent professional development process represents a compulsory issue for teachers. In fact, the Continuous Professional Development (CPD) of the actual teachers has recorded considerable importance during the past two decades. As example, whether in 2002/2003, the teachers’ involvement in CPD activities was considered as optional in approximatively half of European countries (Eurydice, 2005), in 2018, a massive percentage of teachers (92.5 % of lower secondary teachers) participated in CPD activities (European Commission/EACEA/Eurydice. Teachers in Europe: Careers, Development and Wellbeing, 2021). Several European countries (Bulgaria, Spain, Lithuania, Portugal, Romania, Slovenia and Slovakia) considered the participation of teachers in CPD activities as a crucial step for their career development. However, in most European countries, the schools have to design a continuous professional development plan for their own staff. In such conditions, less than 1/3 of schools asks teachers to be involved in a particular CPD plan. In the case of Romanian teachers, their involvement in CPD process is regulated by the National Education Law (1/ 2011), with several amendments and completions. But in order to make it efficient, the whole process must be in accordance to the actual challenges related to teaching practices. In this respect, the paper tries to answer to an issue that envisages the teachers’ CPD as a real priority for the actual educational system.","PeriodicalId":329234,"journal":{"name":"Pro Edu. International Journal of Educational Sciences","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pro Edu. International Journal of Educational Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26520/peijes.2022.6.4.43-52","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

At present, being involved in a permanent professional development process represents a compulsory issue for teachers. In fact, the Continuous Professional Development (CPD) of the actual teachers has recorded considerable importance during the past two decades. As example, whether in 2002/2003, the teachers’ involvement in CPD activities was considered as optional in approximatively half of European countries (Eurydice, 2005), in 2018, a massive percentage of teachers (92.5 % of lower secondary teachers) participated in CPD activities (European Commission/EACEA/Eurydice. Teachers in Europe: Careers, Development and Wellbeing, 2021). Several European countries (Bulgaria, Spain, Lithuania, Portugal, Romania, Slovenia and Slovakia) considered the participation of teachers in CPD activities as a crucial step for their career development. However, in most European countries, the schools have to design a continuous professional development plan for their own staff. In such conditions, less than 1/3 of schools asks teachers to be involved in a particular CPD plan. In the case of Romanian teachers, their involvement in CPD process is regulated by the National Education Law (1/ 2011), with several amendments and completions. But in order to make it efficient, the whole process must be in accordance to the actual challenges related to teaching practices. In this respect, the paper tries to answer to an issue that envisages the teachers’ CPD as a real priority for the actual educational system.
教师的持续专业发展是否代表罗马尼亚教育系统的优先事项?
目前,参与一个永久性的专业发展过程对教师来说是一个强制性的问题。事实上,在过去的二十年中,实际教师的持续专业发展(CPD)已经变得相当重要。例如,无论是在2002/2003年,在大约一半的欧洲国家,教师参与持续专业发展活动被认为是可选的(Eurydice, 2005),在2018年,大量教师(92.5%的初中教师)参加了持续专业发展活动(欧盟委员会/EACEA/Eurydice)。欧洲教师:职业、发展和福祉,2021年)。几个欧洲国家(保加利亚、西班牙、立陶宛、葡萄牙、罗马尼亚、斯洛文尼亚和斯洛伐克)认为教师参加持续专业发展活动是其职业发展的关键步骤。然而,在大多数欧洲国家,学校必须为自己的员工设计一个持续的专业发展计划。在这种情况下,只有不到1/3的学校要求教师参与特定的CPD计划。就罗马尼亚教师而言,他们参与CPD过程受《国家教育法》(2011年第1号)的监管,该法律经过了几次修订和完善。但要使其高效,整个过程必须符合教学实践中相关挑战的实际。在这方面,本文试图回答一个问题,即设想教师的持续专业发展是实际教育系统的真正优先事项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信